Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,789 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Site Design

+ 5 like - 0 dislike
12537 views

We should make our site look more "Physics-ish" than it currently looks. This is achieved not only by changing the logo, but changing many other images, and etc. 

Not only should we make the site more physics-ish, but also concentrate on the usability and user-friendliness aspect of the site.  

So use this thread to suggest improvements to the design of the site.           

asked Feb 23, 2014 in Feature Request by dimension10 (1,985 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Feb 26, 2014 by dimension10

21 Answers

+ 1 like - 2 dislike

The main page http://www.physicsoverflow.org/ should _not_ come up with ''Recent activity in Q&A'' as now, but instead with

- (left half top) an inviting summary of what PO is,

- (right half top) a questionnaire asking for the most important user preferences (namely ''I am interested in [menu of categories and/or representative tags]'') where one or more could be marked,

- buttons "search'' and ''invitation to register'', and

- a button ''view'', which upon clicking gives (on the same page but below the top) to new readers the questions with highest number of votes and/or highest answer quality (and a menu to switch to different modes) on the interests selected before. 

Readers with an account should be able to customize in their profile their preferences about how the main page appears.

Justification:

When visiting a site, I first want to see what is interesting about it (else I leave it) before I am interested in the current traffic. For example, in Wikipedia, who wants to know which entries have been changed most recently? Only the dedicated workers. Everyone else wants to be able to choose a topic of interest.

The content is there upon an additional click, but which content to view should not be left to the accidents of the day. If one wants an inviting general purpose content, one should select from each of a set of representative tags (the ones which are specified in the menu for defining the interest) the one or two best-answered questions. These could be listed next to the menu of tags. to illustrate these. (The list of all tags is useless and should not be visible directly.)

answered Apr 18, 2014 by Arnold Neumaier (15,787 points) [ revision history ]
edited Apr 19, 2014 by Arnold Neumaier

I disagree with this. Looking at my own experience with many sites, I (and in fact most users) prefer to have a list of the content itself on the main page. It looks more inviting, and shows the activity going on. Having a main page with a truckload of useless things is not going to invite anyone.  

I still don't agree with this post even after your edit; it is most inviting when the content list is right there upon page load. 90% of users won't bother to click any further, unless they see a description (question titles) of the content there itself on page load.    

Well, I don't know about other users, but my way of looking at other sites is quite different.

Yes, I prefer to immediately see the list of questions too, it allowes me to immediately jump on posts I am interested in.

Conversely, on Physic s Forums which offers a landing page with a similar in spirit design as proposed here, I face a hell of trouble in efficiently finding things I could be interested in. This is probably among the reasons why I not so often post my too dumb for PO questions there, even though I know that some good people are there and nice physics can get done ...

I had no problem with the PhysicsForums entry page, only with their politics of not allowing to link to unpublished matter.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...