• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

170 submissions , 135 unreviewed
4,246 questions , 1,600 unanswered
5,064 answers , 21,510 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
614 active unimported users
More ...

  What to do with this finding ?

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

I found a family of classical distributions for the classical entanglement, a question challenged by the EPR experiments lecturers, ie A. Aspect.

By adjusting 2 parameters, one can draw a Bell theoretical curve ( in cos² ), a specific curve of the experiments with difference at the extrema, a triangle curve and heralded curves ( more curved and observed in a lab ).

An example of distribution:

The arguments are an effective angle x and an other variable h. 3 classical states +, - and 0 which have respectively the probability distributions functions f, g and z depending on x and h. In Bell experiments, at each trial, h will be shared by the 2 emitted particles while each polarizer/detector system will have his own private variable x. k is an intermediate function for lisibility.

\(k(x,h) = { { (1 - (1 - Cos^{2n}(x-h)-Sin^{2n}(x-h))^m) } } \\ f(x,h) = {k(x,h) \quad {{Cos^{2n}(x-h)} \over { (Cos^{2n}(x-h)+Sin^{2n}(x-h))}}} \\ g(x,h) = {k(x,h) \quad {{Sin^{2n}(x-h)} \over { (Cos^{2n}(x-h)+Sin^{2n}(x-h))} }}\\ z(x,h) = { 1 - f(x,h) - g(x,h) } = { (1 - Cos^{2n}(x-h)-Sin^{2n}(x-h))^m }\)

With only 15% of loss, the classical and quantum curves are almost identical. 15% is a lab dream, whatever you read quickly.

I wrote this article. It will never be published in a serious review since the subject is closed and papers are rejected. But, seriously, it is an important result asking the fundations of the Copenhagen interpretation with a kind of counter example defined by Bell and the experimenters. This calls professional deeper investigations because the potential consequences are not negligibles. Maybe, it removes any hope of seeing quantum applications in computing with the current models.

Perhaps, I turned crazy. Could you kindly check the distribution with an appropriate software for n=5 and m=6.25? Or ask someone familiar with EPR softwares to check it ? I am ok to bet my current small reputation in a review. I don't know if it is possible because the submission of the article was not examined by the serious journals ...

asked Oct 22, 2018 in Chat by igael (360 points) [ revision history ]
edited Nov 2, 2018 by igael

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights