Register

Adv. Query

Q&A (4509)

Reviews (179)

Open problems (31)
Meta (436)

Site Statistics

185 submissions , 145 unreviewed
4,725 questions , 1,928 unanswered
5,268 answers , 22,442 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
743 active unimported users
More ...

Are every consistent String theories compactification of 10D strings?

1082 views

It's known that there are only five consistent tachyonless spacetime-supersymmetric string theories with non-compact ten dimensions, and one more tachyonless ten-dimensional string theory with non-compact ten dimensions that is not supersymmetric ($SO(16)\times SO(16)$ heterotic string). Is any consistent string theory without tachyons in lower dimensions a compactification of any of these? There are known string theories in lower dimensions that is not known how to embebed or is known that can't be embebed as a compactification of their ten-dimensional cousins?

Background: I had read Polchinsky Vol 1 and from Vol 2 the chapters 10, 11, 12, 13 and parts of chapter 14. I hadn't done all the exercises from that.

asked May 19, 2020 in Theoretical Physics by Iliod (35 points) [ revision history ]
edited May 19, 2020 by Iliod

Your comment on this question:

To answer, leave an answer instead. Comments are usually for non-answers.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
To alert a user, please use the "@" command and remove spaces from the username, example, the user "John Doe" should be pinged as "@JohnDoe", while the user "Johndoe" should be pinged as "@Johndoe". The post author is always automatically pinged (unless you are the post author).
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.

Live preview (may slow down editor) Preview

Your name to display (optional):

Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine:

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

Anti-spam verification:

[captcha placeholder]

To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.

Live preview (may slow down editor) Preview

Your name to display (optional):

Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on:

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

Anti-spam verification:

If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOverfl$\varnothing$w
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).

To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

...