Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

180 submissions , 140 unreviewed
4,534 questions , 1,819 unanswered
5,159 answers , 21,956 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
720 active unimported users
More ...

  How to write the matrix of the Hamiltonian in case of 2 subspaces?

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
142 views

Let's imagine that our Hamiltonian acts as follows

\(\mathcal{H}: \mathcal{H}_1 \otimes \mathcal{H}_2 \to \mathcal{H}_1 \otimes \mathcal{H}_2\)

For simplicity, let's suppose that 

\(\mathcal{H} = (a^\dag b + b^\dag a), \)

where \(a, \,\, a^\dag\) \(\)are annihilation and creation operators acting in \(\mathcal{H_1}\) (similarly for b in \(\mathcal{H_2}\)).

We can calculate matrix element

\(<l,p|\mathcal{H}|n, k> = \sqrt{n+1} \sqrt{k} \delta_{l, n+1} \delta_{p,k-1} + \sqrt{n} \sqrt{k+1} \delta_{l,n-1} \delta_{p,k+1}\).

It (matrix of the operator) gives us, formally, 4-dimensional array. Is there a convenient way, how to rewrite it in form of square matrix? Because I'm interested in eigenvectors and in this form it's very uncomfortable to work with the 4-dimensional array. 

asked Jul 1 in Q&A by MightyPower (10 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jul 1 by MightyPower

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

Order your states \(|n,k\rangle = |n\rangle\otimes|k\rangle\)into a sequence of your choice. E.g.

\(|0\rangle=|0\rangle\otimes|0\rangle\), \(|1\rangle=|0\rangle\otimes|1\rangle\),...,\(|N\rangle=|0\rangle\otimes|N\rangle\),\(|N+1\rangle=|1\rangle\otimes|0\rangle\), \(|N+2\rangle=|1\rangle\otimes|1\rangle\),...

I think you get the idea.

answered Jul 1 by Flamma (50 points) [ no revision ]

@Flamma Thank you for the answer. I know this idea, but I was thinking about a bit different. Previously I saw that people write the Hamiltonian in terms of tensor product of matrices of operators and unit matrices. And I'd like to see how it looks like. 

Suppose you have Hilbert spaces \(A\) and \(B\), with Hamiltonians \(H_A\) and \(H_B\), respectively. Let there further be an interaction \(W\) between the systems described by \(A\) and \(B\). \(W\) is defined on the composite system \(A\otimes B\), and the Hamiltonian of the composite system is\[H_{A\otimes B}=H_A\otimes Id_{B}+Id_{A}\otimes H_B+W\] with \(Id_{A}\) the identity on \(A\) and likewise for \(B\). The Hamiltonian you have specified is interaction only, it corresponds to \(W\). If you want to express \(H_{A\otimes B}\) in matrix form, then you have to choose an ordered basis on \(A\otimes B\). Which brings you back to my answer above.

@Flamma Thank you for the answer. 

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
$\varnothing\hbar$ysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...