The paper by Cimasoni and Reshetikhin http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0608070 shows that one can map problems about spin structures on a Riemann surface into problems about dimmer configurations on a graph embedded in the surface.
In particular, there is a 1-1 correspondence between spin structures on a surface and Kasteleyn
orientation on a surface graph with dimer configuration. The number of non-equivalent Kasteleyn orientations of a surface graph of genus
g is 22g and is equal to the number of non-equivalent spin structures on the surface. Kasteleyn operator can be naturally
identified with a discrete version of the Dirac operator. And the partition function of the dimer model is
equal to the sum of 22g Pfaffians, reminiscent of the partition function of free fermions on a Riemann surface of genus g, which is a
linear combination of 22g Pfaffians of Dirac operators.
My question is, given the above combinatorial description of spin structure, is there a way to write a local combinatorial description for the spin cobordism invariants in 2d, e.g. the Arf invariant? (see Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arf_invariant for a definition of the Arf invariant, in particular, the section "The Arf invariant in topology".)
This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2014-10-04 15:29 (UTC), posted by SE-user Zitao Wang