I am trying to generalize the example of the Atiyah-Singer index theorem for the Dirac operator given in the appendix of http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/0802.0634v1.pdf.
Please consider the generalized two-dimensional U(1) instanton configuration given by
A=mn2k2ydxx2k2+y2n2+c2n2k2−mn2k2xdyx2k2+y2n2+c2n2k2
where m, n and k are integers.
The corresponding Yang-Mills field takes the form
F=dA=−2mn4k4c2dx∧dy(x2k2+y2n2+c2n2k2)2
Then, given that F=12Fijdxi∧dxj we have that
F=12Fijdxi∧dxj=12F12dx∧dy+12F21dy∧dx
F=12F12dx∧dy−12F12dy∧dx
F=12F12dx∧dy+12F12dx∧dy
F=F12dx∧dy
and then we obtain
F12dx∧dy=−2mn4k4c2dx∧dy(x2k2+y2n2+c2n2k2)2
which implies that
F12=−2mn4k4c2(x2k2+y2n2+c2n2k2)2
The instantonic number for such configuration is
−12π∫R2F=−12π∫R2F12dxdy
which is reduced to
−12π∫R2F=−12π∫∞−∞∫∞−∞−2mn4k4c2(x2k2+y2n2+c2n2k2)2dxdy
and the computation gives
−12π∫R2F=mkn
Now, the Dirac operator in such background gauge field is given by
⧸D=[0∂x+i∂y−imn2k2y+mn2k2xx2k2+y2n2+c2n2k2∂x−i∂y−imn2k2y−mn2k2xx2k2+y2n2+c2n2k20]
A positive chirality zero-mode satisfies
⧸D[χ(x,y)0]=0
it is to say

with the explicit form

These solutions are square normalizable and then there are mnk linearly independent zero-modes of positive chirality.
On the other hand, a negative chirality zero-mode satisfies
⧸D[0η(x,y)]=0
it is to say

with the explicit form

These solutions are not square normalizable and then there are 0 linearly independent zero-modes of negative chirality.
Then, we obtain that the index of ⧸D , which is the number of linearly independent normalizable
positive chirality zero-modes minus the number of linearly independent normalizable negative chirality zero-modes is mnk−0=mnk. Formally, the index theorem in this case reads:
index(i⧸D)=mnk=−12π∫R2F=−14π∫R2ϵμνFμν
My questions are:
1. Do you agree with the computations in this example?
2. Do you know other example in two-dimensions?