Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,788 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  't Hooft anomaly matching condition and the QCD

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
1827 views

't Hooft anomaly matching condition states that the (chiral) anomalous structure of the given theory is the same independently on the scale. This means that if we have one particle content $\{\psi\}$ for scales $> \Lambda$ with non-zero anomaly, then another particle content $\{\phi\}$ for scales $<\Lambda$ must reproduce anomaly coefficients $d_{abc}$.

Weinberg (in his QFT Vol. 2 Sec. 22.5) states that in Lorentz invariant theory the states $\{\phi\}$ can be recognized as massless helicity $\frac{1}{2}$ fermions or Goldstone bosons. As an example of the second case it proposes to discuss the QCD, where below the spontaneous symmetry breaking scale the anomalous structure of underlying theory with quarks is reproduced by pseudoscalar mesons.

But I don't understand one thing. These pseudo-scalar mesons actually are pseudo-goldstone bosons with non-zero mass. Therefore it seems that they can't reproduce the anomaly, or some argument referring to the fact that they are true Goldstone bosons in some approximation must be used in order to explain why the anomaly can be reproduced by them.

Do You know this argument?

asked Jan 22, 2017 in Theoretical Physics by NAME_XXX (1,060 points) [ no revision ]
recategorized Jan 22, 2017 by Dilaton

The non-zero masses of the pseudo-scalar mesons come from the non-zero masses of the quarks. When the quarks have non-zero masses, there is no chiral symmetry to start with and so there is no discussion of the anomaly.  Only in the zero mass quark case, there is a classical chiral symmetry, which is spontaneously broken, with massless pseudo-scalar mesons (pions...) as Goldstone bosons.

@40227 : but there anyway is the anomalous part in the conservation law of global currents, as well as internal QCD anomalies, and therefore the Wess-Zumino term in effective field theory for mesons. The latter reproduces all underlying QCD's anomalies and has purely anomalous origin, being the solution of the Wess-Zumino consistency conditions.

Maybe I am missing something but the discussion of the Wess-Zumino term is also done in the limit of zero quark masses (with massless quarks, we have chiral symmetry, spontaneously broken by a bilinear quark condensate, so at low energy mesons are well-described by a sigma-model of target a quotient space (original symmetry group divided by the unbroken symmetry group) and the Wess-Zumino term is just one term in this sigma-model).

@40227 : yes, we start from the limit of zero quarks masses. But even in the limit of non-zero masses the Wess-Zumino term remains.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOve$\varnothing$flow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...