Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,789 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Can the density matrix be measured?

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
1245 views

An interesting aspect of partial polarization is that the Stokes parameters can in principle be measured. A simple analogy to the density matrix in quantum-mechanics is the coherency matrix description of is partial polarization. It can be computed in terms of the Stokes parameters

\(J=\begin{bmatrix} E(u_{x}u_{x}^{*})&E(u_{x}u_{y}^{\ast})\\ E(u_{y}u_{x}^{*})&E(u_{y}u_{y}^{\ast}) \end{bmatrix}=\frac12\begin{bmatrix} S_0+S_1&S_2+iS_3\\ S_2-iS_3&S_0-S_1 \end{bmatrix}\)

and hence can in principle be measured. But can the density matrix in quantum-mechanics in principle be measured?

Well, the measurement process of the Stokes parameters can be described by the following Hermitian matrices \(\hat{S}_0=\begin{bmatrix}1&0\\0&1\end{bmatrix}\), \(\hat{S}_1=\begin{bmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{bmatrix}\), \(\hat{S}_2=\begin{bmatrix}0&1\\1&0\end{bmatrix}\) and \(\hat{S}_3=\begin{bmatrix}0&i\\-i&0\end{bmatrix}\). It's easy to see that we get back \(S_i\) if we compute \(\operatorname{Tr}J\hat{S}_i\). Only \(\hat{S}_0\) commutes with all other Hermitian matrices, which somehow means that each individual (quantum analog of a) Stokes parameter can be measured in isolation, but we can't measure them all simultaneously. However, we do not measure all (classical) Stokes parameters simultaneous either, or at least that is not what we mean when we say that the Stokes parameters can be measured in principle.

A more intuitive set of Hermitian matrices for measuring the density matrix might be \(e_x e_x^T=\begin{bmatrix}1&0\\0&0\end{bmatrix}\), \(e_y e_y^T=\begin{bmatrix}0&0\\0&1\end{bmatrix}\), \(\frac12(e_x+e_y)(e_x+e_y)^T=\frac12\begin{bmatrix}1&1\\1&1\end{bmatrix}\) and \(\frac12(e_x-ie_y)(e_x+ie_y)^T=\frac12\begin{bmatrix}1&i\\-i&1\end{bmatrix}\). Here it is straightforward to understand the statistic outcome of a single measurement. So the individual measurements would just ask whether the system is in a certain pure state. But for the density matrix itself, we don't really want to measure whether the system has a certain property or not, but just the probabilities. So can we say that the density matrix can be measured (or observed), but that the meaning of this statement is slightly different from the meaning of the statement that the position or the velocity of a particle can be measured?

asked Jul 17, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by Thomas Klimpel (280 points) [ revision history ]

The density matrix of a single photon spin in quantum-mechanics is in fact identical with the coherency matrix of its partial polarization. See Optical models for quantum mechanics.

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

Yes, the density matrix $\rho$ can be measured, and this is done routinely in many quantum optics experiments. But one usually calls this state estimation or density matrix estimation.

The principle is the following: One measures $N$ observables corresponding to projection $P_k$ of the state to certain pure states $\psi_k$. Since $P_k=\psi_k\psi_k^*$, we have $\psi_k^*\rho \psi_k=\langle P_k\rangle$, and the latter is accumulated through statistics on a corresponding experiment. If the system is an $n$-level system (i.e., if all other levels can be neglected) then $N=n^2$ linearly independent projectors suffice to determine $\rho$ since $n\times n$ density matrices belong to the $n^2$-dimensional real vector space of Hermitian matrices.  (Indeed one less suffices since all density matrices have trace 1). 

answered Jul 19, 2014 by Arnold Neumaier (15,787 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jul 19, 2014 by Arnold Neumaier

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
$\varnothing\hbar$ysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...