Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,789 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Harmonic Crystal using Random Walk

+ 5 like - 0 dislike
1790 views

Me and my advisor were looking for a specific proof of the disorder in $2d$ harmonic crystals. We could not find a paper or a textbook with it, so I thought trying my luck here.

Basically, it is a proof of the instability in an harmonic lattice crystal that uses the idea of random walk and the discrete lagrangian, and it is quite self contained. We were able to somewhat reconstruct it, but a firm reference would obviously help. If my terminology is somewhat vague, here is exactly the theorem we're trying to find its proof:

Consider the lattice $\Lambda = [-L\cdots L]^2 \in \mathbb{Z} ^2 $ and a scalar field $X$ on it, i.e. $ \varphi (x) \in \mathbb{R} $. The particles outside $\Lambda $ are tied down, meaning $ \varphi (x) = 0 $, $\forall x \notin \Lambda $.

Energy will be defined by $\nu (X) = \Sigma _{x \sim y} (\varphi (x) \ - \varphi(y))^2$, sum over all neighboring lattice points. The partition function in the regular way:

$$Z = \int\limits_{\mathbb{R} ^ {|\Lambda|} } dX \exp(-\nu (X)) $$

The theorem is as follows:

For $L \to \infty$, we have that $\langle\varphi (0)^2 \rangle = \int\limits_{\mathbb{R} ^ | \Lambda |} dX \exp(-\nu (X)) \varphi (0) ^2 $ diverges like $\log (| \Lambda | )$

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-02-16 11:49 (UTC), posted by SE-user user42864
asked Nov 10, 2014 in Resources and References by user42864 (0 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Feb 16, 2015
Can you define $\langle\varphi(0)\rangle$?

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-02-16 11:50 (UTC), posted by SE-user Liviu Nicolaescu
Adding it to the original question

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-02-16 11:50 (UTC), posted by SE-user user42864
I think you might want $x\sim y$ also for $x-y=(\pm1,\pm1)$. Otherwise $\langle\phi(0)^2\rangle$ will diverge for more boring reasons.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-02-16 11:50 (UTC), posted by SE-user Yoav Kallus
I wrote that this is only for neighbouring $x,y$

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-02-16 11:50 (UTC), posted by SE-user user42864

1 Answer

+ 7 like - 0 dislike

The object you look at is called the Gaussian Free Field (on your graph, with zero boundary conditions) in dimension $2$. There is a lot known about it. For some pointers see the Wiki page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_free_field, my lecture notes http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~zeitouni/notesGauss.pdf and Sznitman's lecture notes https://www.math.ethz.ch/u/sznitman/SpecialTopics.pdf. Your specific question really asks about the Green function for the Laplacian in the two dimensional box, for which detailed results are available in the probabilistic literature on random walks, see Spitzer's book or Lawler's book.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-02-16 11:50 (UTC), posted by SE-user ofer zeitouni
answered Nov 10, 2014 by ofer zeitouni (0 points) [ no revision ]
Which books, to be precise?

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-02-16 11:50 (UTC), posted by SE-user user42864
Spitzer: principles of random walks (I believe this is the only book Spitzer wrote). Lawler: intersection of random walks

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-02-16 11:50 (UTC), posted by SE-user ofer zeitouni
thank you very much!

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-02-16 11:50 (UTC), posted by SE-user user42864
Sections 1.5 and 1.6 of the book by Lawler have what you are looking for.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-02-16 11:50 (UTC), posted by SE-user Abdelmalek Abdesselam

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsO$\varnothing$erflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...