Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,789 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Max planck's paper on natural units

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
1275 views

I'm looking for a translated version of the paper written by max planck in which he introduced the natural unit system. If this is not possible , I will be satisfied with a reference which describes his ideas. 

Many thanks 

asked Feb 11, 2018 in Resources and References by anonymous [ no revision ]

I just would like to say that, in my opinion, there is nothing "natural" in Plank units. Plank combined some constants including the Newton gravity constant $G$ in order to obtain some system of units. But at his time there were other forces available with their own constants, , for example, electric and magnetic ones; then why not use them instead of $G$? In addition, in the future there have been discovered some other forces with new constants unknown to M. Plank at at his early time. It means that his "natural" system of units misses essential physical phenomena and thus cannot be called "natural". No wonder these units correspond to nothing physically observed. But, never mind.

@VladimitKalitvianski please try to exercise a minimum of intellectual discipline. I gather you indulge in the persona of the lone wolf outsmarting the establishment, and that may be interesting to watch, if done well, and may provide food for thought for others. But comments like the one above just show off confusion of elementary terms. If you don't concentrate to a minimum before writing a comment, it neither serves your own cause nor, worse, that of this poor forum, which happens to have moderators too polite to take the evident steps that have already banned you from other places.

@UrsSchreiber: Please do not concentrate on my person; better provide the necessary references and, if you have any, some arguments why the Plank's system of units is so "natural" that you want me to be banned.

@UrsSchreiber: if "-1" is your knowledgeable answer to my comment, then it is too few for this noble site. Banning and downviting is not doing physics.

Dear all I know that you are kind people, be patient please ... I asked someone to find the paper in english and after 2 days of intensive search and calls to libraries and academias, he didn't found it. At the opposite , the next Planck papers are ready in many versions.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOve$\varnothing$flow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...