• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

204 submissions , 162 unreviewed
5,024 questions , 2,178 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,682 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
815 active unimported users
More ...

  Could time (or space) discretisation be needed in order to preserve the law of increase of entropy?

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

In Introductory Statistical Mechanics, 2nd Edition, by R. Bowley and M. Sanchez, pages 81-83 is given a proof of the second law of thermodynamics by showing that the probability of a system being in a state described by an energy 20 standard deviations away from the mean (which is the energy corresponding to the maximum value of entropy) is so small that even considering that the system is in a different microstate every 10-50  seconds would yield approximately one such state every 1038 seconds (which is practically never).

My question is what stops us from considering that the system is sampling a different microstate every, say, 10-1000 seconds, provided that time and space are considered continuous variables? In this case the probabilities would have unreasonable values for the system being in a state in which the entropy would be much lower than its maximum possible value. One way of saving this argument could be that either time or space (or both) could be discrete so that no system could change its microstate faster than a given amount of time (which could depend on the system's microscopic parameters such as the number of particles). Is this a necessary assumption in order to keep the argument valid?

asked Aug 15, 2021 in Q&A by anonymous [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights