# A question about the coupling between string and gauge field $A_{\mu}$

+ 5 like - 0 dislike
522 views

I have a question about deriving the coupling term of string and the gauge field on brane. According to David Tong's lecture note p184/(191 in acrobat), the coupling is given by

$$S_{\mathrm{end-point}}=\int_{\partial M} d \tau A_{a}(X) \frac{d X^a}{d \tau} \tag{1}$$

It is said that the coupling is obtained by exponentiating the vertex operator, "as described at the beginning of Section 7", $$V_{\mathrm{photon}} \sim \int_{\partial M} d \tau \zeta_a \partial^{\tau} X^a e^{ i p \cdot x} \tag{2}$$

My question is about the logic of exponentiating the vertex operator.

In the beginning of section 7 of the lecture note, in order to obtain the coupling between string and the gauge fields, the Polyakov action is extended in curved space $$S= \frac{1}{4 \pi \alpha' } \int d^2 \sigma \sqrt{g} g^{\alpha \beta} \partial_{\alpha} X^{\mu} \partial_{\beta} X^{\nu} G_{\mu\nu}(X) \tag{7.1}$$

The coupling comes from the bending of spacetime, e.g. $$G_{\mu\nu} (X) = \delta_{\mu\nu} + h_{\mu\nu} (X)$$ $$Z= \int \mathcal{D} X \mathcal{D} g e^{-S_{\mathrm{Poly}} -V} = \int \mathcal{D} X \mathcal{D} g e^{-S_{\mathrm{Poly}} } (1-V +\frac{1}{2} V^2 + \dots )$$
$$V= \frac{1}{4 \pi \alpha'} \int d^2 \sigma \sqrt{g} g^{\alpha \beta} \partial_{\alpha} X^{\mu} \partial_{\beta} X^{\nu} h_{\mu\nu}(X) \tag{7.2}$$

In order to obtain Eq. (1) from (2), where is the bending of metric?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 16:48 (UCT), posted by SE-user user26143

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

There is no 2-D metrics here, because we are working with the boundary $\partial M$

You could imagine a standard action $S_0 = \int_{\partial M} d\tau A_a \frac{d X^a}{d \tau}$, where $A_a$ is constant.

With a small perturbation, we will have : $A_a(X) = A_a + \epsilon_a(X)$, and we have an action $S = \int_{\partial M} d\tau A_a(X) \frac{d X^a}{d \tau}$

A partition function would be $Z = \int dX e^{-S_0 - V} = \int dX e^{-S_0}(1-V +\frac{1}{2} V^2 + \dots )$, with $V = \int_{\partial M} \epsilon_a(X)\frac{d X^a}{d \tau}$

$A_a(X)$ are coherent states of photons, as $G_{\mu\nu}(X)$ are coherent states of gravitons.

In some sense, we may consider that the photon vertex operator corresponds to a very special (non-coherent) case where $\epsilon_a(X) = \zeta_a e^{ip.x}$, in the same way as the graviton vertex operator is a very special (non-coherent) case where $h_{\mu\nu}(X) = \zeta_{\mu\nu}e^{ip.x}$

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 16:48 (UCT), posted by SE-user Trimok
answered Sep 12, 2013 by (955 points)
Thanks a lot. I still have a question, how do you get $$S_0 = \int_{\delta M} d \tau A_a \frac{ d X^a}{d \tau}$$, from Eq. (3.2.3b) in Polchinski?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 16:48 (UCT), posted by SE-user user26143
I don't think it is possible. For an open string, we know that we have to use vertex operators on the boundary $\delta M$ (for instance, at tree level, with the disk - Polchinski 6.2.35). So $S = \int_{\delta M} d\tau A_a(X) \frac{d X^a}{d \tau}$ is the coherent version (morally exponential) of the photon vertex operator.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 16:48 (UCT), posted by SE-user Trimok
Thank you very much.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 16:48 (UCT), posted by SE-user user26143
Minor notational comment to the answer (v1) and its comments: A boundary of a manifold $M$ is usually denoted $\partial M$ not $\delta M$.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 16:48 (UCT), posted by SE-user Qmechanic
@Qmechanic : Right : corrected

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 16:48 (UCT), posted by SE-user Trimok

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ys$\varnothing$csOverflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.