Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  What is topological degeneracy in condensed matter physics?

+ 6 like - 0 dislike
794 views
  1. What is topological degeneracy in strongly correlated systems such as FQH?

  2. What is the difference between topological degeneracy and ordinary degeneracy?

  3. Why is topological degeneracy important for the non-Abelian statistics?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-05 04:15 (UCT), posted by SE-user Jeremy
asked Sep 28, 2012 in Theoretical Physics by Jeremy (105 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 6 like - 0 dislike

(1) What is topological degeneracy in strongly correlated systems such as FQH?

From Wiki, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topological_degeneracy :

Topological degeneracy is a phenomenon in quantum many-body physics, that the ground state of a gapped many-body system become degenerate in the large system size limit, and that such a degeneracy cannot be lifted by any local perturbations as long as the system size is large.

Topological degeneracy can be used as protected qubits which allows us to perform topological quantum computation. It is believed that the appearance of topological degeneracy implies the topological order (or long-range entanglements) in the ground state. Many-body states with topological degeneracy are described by topological quantum field theory at low energies.

Topological degeneracy was first introduced to physically define topological order. In two dimensional space, the topological degeneracy depends on the topology of space, and the topological degeneracy on high genus Riemann surfaces encode all information on the quantum dimensions and the fusion algebra of the quasiparticles. In particular, the topological degeneracy on torus is equal to the number of quasiparticles types.

The topological degeneracy also appears in the situation with trapped quasiparticles, where the topological degeneracy depends on the number and the type of the trapped quasiparticles. Braiding those quasiparticles leads to topologically protected non-Abelian geometric phase, which can be used to perform topologically protected quantum computation.

The topological degeneracy also appear in non-interacting fermion systems (such as p+ip superconductors) with trapped defects (such as vortices). In non-interacting fermion systems, there is only one type of topological degeneracy where number of the degenerate states is given by $2^{N_d/2}/2$, where $N_d$ is the number of the defects (such as the number of vortices). Such topological degeneracy is referred as "Majorana zero-mode" on the defects. In contrast, there are many types of topological degeneracy for interacting systems. A systematic description of topological degeneracy is given by tensor category (or monoidal category) theory.

(2) What is the difference between topological degeneracy and ordinary degeneracy?

Topological degeneracy, in general, is not exact degeneracy for finite systems. Topological degeneracy becomes exact in large system size limit. Ordinary degeneracy is usually exact degeneracy.

(3) Why is topological degeneracy important for the non-Abelian statistics?

Topologically protected non-Abelian geometric phases can only appear when there is a topological degeneracy. See How Non-abelian anyons arise in solid-state systems?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-05 04:15 (UCT), posted by SE-user Xiao-Gang Wen
answered Sep 28, 2012 by Xiao-Gang Wen (3,485 points) [ no revision ]
Prof. Wen, Thank you so much!

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-05 04:15 (UCT), posted by SE-user Jeremy

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\varnothing$ysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...