Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

206 submissions , 164 unreviewed
5,103 questions , 2,249 unanswered
5,355 answers , 22,798 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  1+1D Bosonization on a line segment or a compact ring

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
755 views

I have been informed that 1+1D Bosonization/Fermionization on a line segment or 1+1D Bosonization/Fermionization a compact ring are different -

Although I know that Bosonization can rewrite fermions in the non-local expression of bosons. But:

bosons and fermions are fundamentally different for the case of on a 1D compact ring.

Is this true? How is the Bosonization/Fermionization different on a line segment or a compact ring? Does it matter whether the line segment is finite $x\in[a,b]$ or infinite $x\in(-\infty,\infty)$? Why? Can someone explain it physically? Thanks!

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-06-04 11:37 (UCT), posted by SE-user Idear
asked Mar 8, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by wonderich (1,500 points) [ no revision ]
I think, when people say line segment, they often mean an interval $[a,b]$. Regarding your question, my low-brow understanding is that the difference has to do with braiding. You cannot braid two (hard-core) bosons or fermions on a line segment, but you can on a ring. On a slightly more technical level, an example would be the Jordan-Wigner transformation for hard-core bosons. We need to be careful about boundary conditions when we do JW transformation on a ring.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-06-04 11:37 (UCT), posted by SE-user Isidore Seville
Very good, Isidore, it totally makes sense.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-06-04 11:37 (UCT), posted by SE-user Idear

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsO$\varnothing$erflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...