Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,789 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  What are the mathematical prerequisites to understand this paper?

+ 6 like - 0 dislike
2863 views

What are the mathematical prerequisites to understand this paper?

Blumenhagen et al. Four-dimensional String Compactifications with D-Branes, Orientifolds and Fluxes. Phys. Rept. 445 no. 1-6, pp. 1-193 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.04.003, arXiv:hep-th/0610327.

I know quantum field theory and some string theory (at the level of string theory demystified) What else should I know in order to be able to read this paper?


This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-07-09 07:34 (UCT), posted by SE-user sdfxvcv

asked Jan 25, 2013 in Resources and References by sdfxvcv (0 points) [ revision history ]
recategorized Sep 12, 2014 by Dilaton
Would also be good to receive some tips on sources and references where best to learn the required math.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-07-09 07:35 (UCT), posted by SE-user vonjd
I suggest you to start reading the article and you'll see things you possibly don't understand, then do research about those topics. And if it's possible, you should look for a tutor in your university.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-07-09 07:35 (UCT), posted by SE-user Anuar
Halfway through the intro (on page 16), the authors state what they expect from the reader. I suggest you start with the Polchinski textbook, which is very legible. In my opinion there shouldn't be any real mathematical difficulties at this point - everything you need is explained in string textbooks on the physicist level. Of course you need some ideas about manifolds and representation theory, but if you're not at that level you'd better defer working on string theory at the moment ;)

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-07-09 07:35 (UCT), posted by SE-user Vibert
Hi @sdfxvcv: We like very much the topic and level of your question. However we often see that OP asks a soft-question about prerequisites and references rather than posing an actual physics question. Such soft-questions are quite restricted on Phys.SE. It is much better to ask the first actual physics question that you have when you try to understand a subject.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-07-09 07:35 (UCT), posted by SE-user Qmechanic
@Qmechanic can I get somewhere the information the OP wanted to get? I was very interested in an answer to this question too. Nowhere on Physics SE can one find information about what mathematical prerequisites are needed to understand such papers and what are nice introductions to get started. All such questions get closed immediately. This is very discouraging when one wants to learn stuff :-(

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-07-09 07:35 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dilaton
Now I am trying to find a way how we can get the information, or more generally about what are the mathematical prerequisits to understand ST and about nice introductory material here. People who were interested in this information too should come to meta to help find a way to get it, if there is any ...

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-07-09 07:35 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dilaton
Maybe useful things can be found in the answers to this related question physics.stackexchange.com/q/2528/2751

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-07-09 07:35 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dilaton

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysic$\varnothing$Overflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...