• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

204 submissions , 162 unreviewed
5,030 questions , 2,184 unanswered
5,344 answers , 22,704 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  Working with quadratic Lie algebras

+ 6 like - 0 dislike

A quadratic Lie algebra is a Lie algebra with an invariant inner product and the main examples are semisimple Lie algebras. This definition then makes sense in any linear symmetric monoidal category. I have a series of questions about generalising constructions from semisimple Lie algebras to this abstract setting. Instead of one post with a list of questions (which is frowned on) I have in mind a series of posts. This will also allow me to "edit" posts to take into account any responses before posting.

The first construction is the universal enveloping algebra. This is not usually regarded as mysterious but there are some points to ponder. There are actually two constructions one is as a deformation of the symmetric algebra of the adjoint representation. This was Poincare's construction. This is an early example of a universal quantisation. This makes sense in the abstract setting of symmetric monoidal categories. The other approach was taken by Birkhoff-Witt (independently, and decades later) and constructs the universal enveloping algebra as a quotient of the tensor algebra of the adjoint representation. This does not make sense in a symmetric monoidal category which is not abelian.

If we assume/impose the condition that the Casimir is non-zero on every non-trivial irreducible representation then I think the category of representations is semisimple. In this case the Birkhoff-Witt construction is defined (and agrees with Poincare's approach).

Now we come to the Yangian. This is defined by Drinfeld by a presentation. More specifically as a quotient of the semi-direct product of the universal enveloping algebra and the tensor algebra. I have not seen a proof that this has the properties it should have. My first question is then whether there is anywhere I can find a proof?

The real question then is what is the simplest construction of the Yangian for a general quadratic Lie algebra? I say simplest because I believe the high-powered machinery of universal quantisations does give one construction. My hope would be constructions analogous to one or both of the constructions of the universal enveloping algebra.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2014-10-09 20:06 (UTC), posted by SE-user Bruce Westbury

asked Jul 1, 2010 in Mathematics by Bruce Westbury (30 points) [ revision history ]
edited Oct 10, 2014 by Arnold Neumaier
Bruce, have you looked at Molev's relatively recent book on Yangians for your foundational question? (He is mostly interested in the classical Lie algebra cases, which admit alternative presentations related to twisted Yangians. I am not convinced that there is only one construction of Yangian: Drinfeld famously gave two very different presentations.) For universal enveloping algebra in symmetric monoidal categories, see mathoverflow.net/questions/25020/…

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2014-10-09 20:06 (UTC), posted by SE-user Victor Protsak
Thanks Victor. I have added an answer to question 25020. I will see if I can find Molev's book. My concern is that $SL(n)$ and $GL(n)$ are exceptional in the sense that the adjoint representation appears in the symmetric square of the adjoint representation. Most of the work on Yangians relies on this which is not what I want.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2014-10-09 20:06 (UTC), posted by SE-user Bruce Westbury
This book relies on the evaluation homomorphism. The Yangians for orthogonal and symplectic groups are "twisted Yangians" which are not the usual ones.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2014-10-09 20:06 (UTC), posted by SE-user Bruce Westbury

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights