Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.
W3Counter Web Stats

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public β tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

208 submissions , 166 unreviewed
5,138 questions , 2,258 unanswered
5,414 answers , 23,090 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
823 active unimported users
More ...

  A technical question in Feix's construction of hyperkahler metric on cotangent bundles

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
866 views

I am now reading Feix's paper Hyperkahler metrics on cotangent bundles and I have a technical question to ask.

In his paper, for an analytic Kähler manifold (X,J,ω), Feix considered its complexification Xc which in my understanding can be thought of as a neighborhood of the diagonal in X×ˉX, where ˉX is the complex manifold X with complex structure J. One can extend ω analytically to a holomorphic symplectic form ωc on Xc. This ωc determines two natural holomorphic Lagrangian foliations L+ and L. Let zi and zj be local holomorphic coordinates of X and ˉX respectively, then the leaves of L+ and L are given by ziconst and zjconst.

As the diagonal intersects each leaf at exactly one point, one may identify the space of leaves of L+ with X and the space of leaves of L with ˉX respectively.

From now on let us focus on L+ exclusively. By shrinking Xc if necessary, one may assume that Λx is simply connected for any xX= "space of leaves of L+", where Λx is the leaf corresponding to x. As a consequence of Lagrangian foliation, each Λx has a natural affine structure, so it makes sense to write Vx to be the space of affine functions on Λx. By 1-connectedness of Λx, each Vx is a vector space of complex dimension n+1, where n is the complex dimension of X. These Vx patch up to a complex vector bundle VX.

Feix claims without further explanation that this bundle is holomorphic. I really would like to know the description of the holomorphic structure here. It occurs to me that the most natural frames one can think of actually have anti-holomorphic transition functions as follows:

Let zi,zj be local coordinates for Xc, the leaves of L+ are ziconst. Fix a leaf Λx, it intersects the diagonal at the point whose coordinate is z=x,z=ˉx. One can find parallel 1-forms θi on Λx by parallel transport with respect to the flat connection with initial value specified by θi|(x,ˉx)=dzi|(x,ˉx). These θi must be a closed form and their primitives fi along with the constant function 1 form a basis of Vx. However, if you work with this particular frame, then under holomorphic coordinate change of X, the transition matrix of these frame depends anti-holomorphically on X.

Surely one can switch L+ and L to solve the holomorphicity problem here. But I think a bigger trouble is then introduced since in that case the map ϕ defined by Feix loses its holomorphicity.

Thank you!

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2014-11-11 12:31 (UTC), posted by SE-user Piojo
asked Nov 4, 2014 in Mathematics by Piojo (20 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Nov 11, 2014

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol in the following word:
pysicsOverflw
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...