Register

Adv. Query

Q&A (4870)

Reviews (203)

Open problems (47)
Meta (439)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,789 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

Is it possible to build a Backward Time Viewer?

2118 views

As everyone knows, there are many doubts if backward time travel can be possible, since it raises many paradoxes of which the most known is probably the Grandfather paradox.

My question is the following: "According to the current state of our Physics knowledge, there is something that prevents us to build a Backward Time Viewer?".

By Backward Time Viewer I mean a machine which can display events occurring in an arbitrary date in the past (not necessarily in an arbitrary location). Clearly, this is not a precise definition, but I think is better to leave you some freedom to choose a precise definition as part of your answer.

I am not a physicist, but I thought that a Backward Time Viewer can be in contradiction with Heisenberg uncertainty principle in such a way: We measure with arbitrary precision the position of a particle at time 0. Then, at time 1, with a Backward Time Viewer we measure with arbitrary precision the velocity at time 0 of the particle. Thus we can obtain the position and velocity of the particle at time 0 with arbitrary precision, in constrast with the uncertainty principle.

Closed as per community consensus as the post is popular physics question

asked Nov 17, 2014 in Closed Questions by Charwe (-10 points) [ revision history ]
recategorized Jun 21, 2015 by Dilaton

Hi Charve,

PhysicsOverflow is a graduate-level and above physics site, which means that it is for advanced students and physicists. This seems rather a popular physics question, targeted at a general audience. I am therefore voting to close.

commented Nov 17, 2014 by Dilaton (6,240 points) [ no revision ]

Hi Dilaton,

actually I do not see how my question is not of interest for graduate-level or above physicists. Surely, to understand the question itself are not required any graduate-level knowledges. However, I think that the problem is not trivial and that a precise answer needs deep knowledges of a large spectrum of Physics.

commented Nov 17, 2014 by Charwe (-10 points) [ no revision ]

A "backward time viewer" could be consistent with the uncertainty principle, if it was restricted by the usual limits to precise measurement. For example, if accurately measuring the position of the particle now, made it impossible to measure its velocity in the future, using the viewer.

commented Nov 18, 2014 by Mitchell Porter (1,950 points) [ no revision ]

Your comment on this question:

To answer, leave an answer instead. Comments are usually for non-answers.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
To alert a user, please use the "@" command and remove spaces from the username, example, the user "John Doe" should be pinged as "@JohnDoe", while the user "Johndoe" should be pinged as "@Johndoe". The post author is always automatically pinged (unless you are the post author).
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.

Live preview (may slow down editor) Preview

Your name to display (optional):

Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine:

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

Anti-spam verification:

If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar\varnothing$sicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).

Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights

...