Thank you for spending time on the following question.
I am trying to make an explicit example of Korevaar-Schoen convergence. The problem I am facing is that I cannot find the limit of the harmonic maps in the following example I hope to consider. The process I am doing mostly follows from [1].
Let M=S1×S2, and consider the hyperbolic 3-space Xk=H3={(x1,x2,x3)|x3>0} with the canonical metric dH3=dx21+dx22+dx23x23
The representation
ρk:π1(M)→SL(2;C) is
ρk(1)=[k001k]
The action of
ρk(1) on
H3 in the case we need to use is
ρk(1)(0,0,x3)=(0,0,k2x3)
By a theorem of Donaldson, we can find an equivariant map uk from the universal cover of M to H3 satisfying the relation uk(αx)=ρk(α)uk(x) (α here is an element in π1(M)). In the case I am considering, we can construct the following harmonic map: uk:R1×S2⟶H3(t,x)⟼(0,0,eCkt)
Here,
Ck=2lnk is a constant related to k. With this definition,
uk is an equivariant map. The reason
uk is harmonic is that the only harmonic map from
S2 to
H3 is constant and the image of
uk is geodesic. The energy I compute for this map is
E(uk)=C2k.
By theorem 3.1 of [1], if we define ˆdH3,k=dH3, we have a Korevaar-Schoen limit of the rescaled harmonic maps uk:˜M→(H3,ˆdH3,k) to a map ˜M→T, where T is a R-tree.
Question:
Here is my goal: I hope to know explicitly the limit in this case.
The problem I have is that I don't think the Korevaar-Schoen limit exists in the example I consider when I try to use the definition in [2]. Because eCktC2k for a fixed t will converge to infinity when k goes to infinity. I don't know where I made a mistake. Maybe the maps uk I constructed are not harmonic?
[1] G. Daskalopoulous, S. Dostoglou, R. Wentworth, Character Varieties and Harmonic Maps to R-trees, arXiv:math/9810033v1
[2] N. Korevaar, R. Schoen, Global Existence Theorems for Harmonic maps to Non-locally compact spaces, Comm. Anal. Geom. 5(1997), no.2, 213-266
This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-04-09 12:16 (UTC), posted by SE-user Siqi He