Suppose C is a 3-form, and G is a 4-form defined by G=dC. Also, M11 is an 11-dimensional manifold (without a boundary), W6 is a 6-dimensional submanifold of M11 and DϵW6=−SϵW6 is the 4-sphere bundle over W6.
Further, suppose ρ is a 0-form and e12 is a 2-form. Under a variation,
δC=−d(ρe12)
I want to compute the variation δSCS in the Chern-Simons integral
SCS=−limϵ→0∫M11∖DϵW6C∧G∧G
Apparently, the correct answer is
δSCS=−limϵ→∫SϵW6ρe12∧G∧G
But what I get is something else. Here is my detailed derivation.
δSCS=−limϵ→0[∫M11∖DϵW6δC∧G∧G+2∫M11∖DϵW6δG∧C∧G]
From integration by parts
∫∂(M11∖DϵW6)δC∧C∧G=∫M11∖DϵW6d(δC∧C∧G)=∫M11∖DϵW6δdC∧C∧G−∫M11∖DϵW6δC∧G∧G
So it should follow that
δSCS=−limϵ→0[2∫∂(M11∖DϵW6)δC∧C∧G+3∫M11∖DϵW6δC∧G∧G]
As M11∖DϵW6, for finite ϵ cannot support an 11-form, the second integral vanishes inside the limit, and we are left with
δSCS=−limϵ→0[2∫∂(M11∖DϵW6)δC∧C∧G]
Substituting δC=−d(ρe12) we get
δSCS=+limϵ→0[2∫∂(M11∖DϵW6)d(ρe12)∧C∧G]
Now,
d(ρe12∧(C∧G))=d(ρe12)∧C∧G+ρe12∧d(C∧G)
and ∂(∂(M11∖DϵW6))≡0, so
δSCS=−limϵ→0[2∫∂(M11∖DϵW6)ρe12∧G∧G]
As a last step, using ∂(M11∖DϵW6)=−SϵW6, one gets the final expression
δSCS=+limϵ→0[2∫SϵW6ρe12∧G∧G]
This is off by a sign and a factor of 2.
What seems to be wrong in the derivation here?
Physics background: These algebraic manipulations are inspired by a calculation of the M5-brane anomaly in M-theory, perhaps discussed first in a paper by Freed, Minasian, Harvey and Moore (http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9803205). It has been pointed out in some follow-up papers that there are an odd number of minus signs involved, and that the original paper may have overlooked one sign. (Of course the M5-brane anomaly is seen to cancel, but the cancellation is a bit involved and requires a careful understanding of minus signs and factors. Hence this question.)
This post imported from StackExchange Mathematics at 2015-08-09 22:38 (UTC), posted by SE-user leastaction