Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.
W3Counter Web Stats

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public β tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

208 submissions , 166 unreviewed
5,138 questions , 2,258 unanswered
5,414 answers , 23,090 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
823 active unimported users
More ...

  Integration by parts on manifold with a boundary

+ 6 like - 0 dislike
1567 views

Suppose C is a 3-form, and G is a 4-form defined by G=dC. Also, M11 is an 11-dimensional manifold (without a boundary), W6 is a 6-dimensional submanifold of M11 and DϵW6=SϵW6 is the 4-sphere bundle over W6.

Further, suppose ρ is a 0-form and e12 is a 2-form. Under a variation,

δC=d(ρe12)

I want to compute the variation δSCS in the Chern-Simons integral

SCS=limϵ0M11DϵW6CGG

Apparently, the correct answer is

δSCS=limϵSϵW6ρe12GG

But what I get is something else. Here is my detailed derivation.

δSCS=limϵ0[M11DϵW6δCGG+2M11DϵW6δGCG]

From integration by parts

(M11DϵW6)δCCG=M11DϵW6d(δCCG)=M11DϵW6δdCCGM11DϵW6δCGG

So it should follow that

δSCS=limϵ0[2(M11DϵW6)δCCG+3M11DϵW6δCGG]

As M11DϵW6, for finite ϵ cannot support an 11-form, the second integral vanishes inside the limit, and we are left with

δSCS=limϵ0[2(M11DϵW6)δCCG]

Substituting δC=d(ρe12) we get

δSCS=+limϵ0[2(M11DϵW6)d(ρe12)CG]

Now,

d(ρe12(CG))=d(ρe12)CG+ρe12d(CG)

and ((M11DϵW6))0, so

δSCS=limϵ0[2(M11DϵW6)ρe12GG]

As a last step, using (M11DϵW6)=SϵW6, one gets the final expression

δSCS=+limϵ0[2SϵW6ρe12GG]

This is off by a sign and a factor of 2.

What seems to be wrong in the derivation here?

Physics background: These algebraic manipulations are inspired by a calculation of the M5-brane anomaly in M-theory, perhaps discussed first in a paper by Freed, Minasian, Harvey and Moore (http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9803205). It has been pointed out in some follow-up papers that there are an odd number of minus signs involved, and that the original paper may have overlooked one sign. (Of course the M5-brane anomaly is seen to cancel, but the cancellation is a bit involved and requires a careful understanding of minus signs and factors. Hence this question.)


This post imported from StackExchange Mathematics at 2015-08-09 22:38 (UTC), posted by SE-user leastaction

asked Aug 8, 2015 in Mathematics by leastaction (425 points) [ revision history ]
edited Aug 10, 2015 by leastaction

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

You have that

δSCS=limϵ0[M11DϵW6δCGG+2M11DϵW6δGCG]

and

(M11DϵW6)δCCG=M11DϵW6d(δCCG)=

M11DϵW6δdCCGM11DϵW6δCGG

From the last equation we derive that

M11DϵW6δCGG=(M11DϵW6)δCCG+M11DϵW6δdCCG

it is to say

M11DϵW6δCGG=(M11DϵW6)δCCG+M11DϵW6δGCG

Replacing the last equation in the first equation we obtain that

δSCS=limϵ0[(M11DϵW6)δCCG+M11DϵW6δGCG+2M11DϵW6δGCG]

which is reduced to

δSCS=limϵ0[(M11DϵW6)δCCG+3M11DϵW6δGCG]

From this last result we derive that

δSCS=limϵ0SϵW6ρe12GG

Do you agree?

answered Aug 9, 2015 by juancho (1,130 points) [ revision history ]
edited Aug 9, 2015 by juancho

Ah, so

δSCS=limϵ0(M11DϵW6)δCCG

Now, you write δC=d(ρe12) to get 

δSCS=limϵ0(M11DϵW6)d(ρe12)CG

At this point, one has to use the following identity

d(\rho e_2^1 \wedge C \wedge G) = d(\rho e_2^1) \wedge C \wedge G + (-1)^{2) \rho e_2^1 \wedge d(C \wedge G) = d(\rho e_2^1) \wedge C \wedge G + \rho e_2^1 \wedge G \wedge G

(note the sign)

So when you do integration by parts, you get an extra minus sign

δSCS=+limϵ0(M11DϵW6)ρe12GG

Finally, you have one more minus sign 

δSCS=limϵ0SϵW6ρe12GG

Thanks @juancho!

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol in the following word:
pysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...