Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

206 submissions , 164 unreviewed
5,103 questions , 2,249 unanswered
5,355 answers , 22,798 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Why did formation of the first stars (population III) not happen earlier?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
1538 views

Was it the cooling of the universe? Naively, I would expect the lowering density to work against star formation.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-09-27 16:04 (UTC), posted by SE-user Aabaakawad
asked Sep 14, 2015 in Astronomy by Aabaakawad (55 points) [ no revision ]
See also follow-on Q: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/207237/…

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-09-27 16:04 (UTC), posted by SE-user Aabaakawad

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

We can't observe the population III stars directly so our knowledge of them is based upon computer modelling. The modelling shows that the main problem is getting the collapsing clouds of hydrogen to cool enough to become dense.

It might seem a bit odd to require that the clouds cool, because after all we want the forming star to get hot enough for fusion to start. The trouble is that we need massive (much more massive than a single star) gas clouds to become dense enough for star formation to start. For this we need a way for the collapsing cloud to shed energy, but hydrogen atoms aren't very good at this and the early universe was mostly hydrogen and helium with only trace amounts of heavier atoms.

In today's gas clouds the cooling is mainly due to molecules and heavier elements. The mechanism is that collisions excite rotational, vibrational and electronic states, and these decay by emission of photons. The end result is to radiate away the kinetic energy (i.e. heat) of the cloud.

In the early universe this couldn't happen because there weren't any molecules or heavy elements. Localised cooling only became possible when the average temperature became low enough for hydrogen molecules to form. Once hydrogen molecules built up to a significant level they could start converting kinetic energy to photons so it could be radiated away.

And that's what set the timescale for the first star formation. The average temperature had to fall enough for hydrogen molecules to form.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-09-27 16:04 (UTC), posted by SE-user John Rennie
answered Sep 14, 2015 by John Rennie (470 points) [ no revision ]
I can see where this can lead to a chain reaction where the first supernova in a galaxy would trigger nearby gas to collapse, both because of shock compression and injection of heavy metals, and so on, effectively igniting the whole galaxy from one or a handful of flashpoints.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-09-27 16:04 (UTC), posted by SE-user Aabaakawad
@Aabaakawad: as it happens this was discussed briefly in a recent episode of the BBC programme Horizon. I've provided a link, but you won't be able to watch the video if you're outside the UK. The programme briefly discusses the modelling of PIII star formation by Volker Bromm, and he mentions the cooling problem.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-09-27 16:04 (UTC), posted by SE-user John Rennie
you may be interested in my follow on Q. physics.stackexchange.com/questions/207237/…

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-09-27 16:04 (UTC), posted by SE-user Aabaakawad

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...