# Coupling constant to pseudoscalar and chiral transformation

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
394 views

Suppose we have lagrangian of interaction of pseudoscalar field $\varphi$ with EM field $F_{\mu \nu}$
$$L_{\varphi \gamma \gamma} = \frac{\varphi (x)}{f_{\gamma}}\epsilon^{\mu \nu \alpha \beta}F_{\mu \nu}F_{\alpha \beta} \qquad (1)$$

There are also fermions in theory with lagrangian

$$L_{q} = \bar{f}(i\gamma_{\mu}D^{\mu} - m_{f})f, \quad D_{\mu} \equiv \partial_{\mu} - ieA_{\mu}$$

Lagrangian $(2)$ generates effective $qq\varphi$ interactions

$$L_{ff\varphi} = f_{ff\varphi }m_{f}\frac{\varphi}{f_{\gamma}} \bar{f}\gamma_{5}f + f_{ff\varphi}{'} \frac{\varphi}{f_{\gamma}} \bar{f}\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\gamma_{5}f + ...$$

I want to get explicit expression for coupling constant $f_{ff\varphi }$. For doing this, I need to compute triangle diagram $\varphi \to f\bar{f}$, where two photons and one fermion $f$ running in the loop. In the result, the coupling constant $f_{ff\varphi }$ has form
$$f_{ ff\varphi} \sim \alpha_{EM}$$
But I have got some problem when I've compared this result with formal result which is obtained from chiral rotation. Below I describe this problem.

I can perform the rotation

$f \to e^{-ic\gamma_{5}\frac{\varphi}{f_{\gamma}}}$. This rotation induces summand
$$c\frac{\alpha_{EM}}{8 \pi} \epsilon^{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta}F_{\alpha \beta}F_{\gamma \delta}$$
in lagrangian, and for $c = -\frac{8 \pi }{f_{\gamma}}$ I eliminate $\varphi \gamma \gamma$ interaction term. The resulting interaction of $\varphi$ with fermions is
$$L{'}_{\varphi f f} = m_{f}\bar{f}_{L}e^{i16 \pi\frac{\varphi}{f_{\gamma}}}f_{R} + h.c. + 8\pi\frac{\partial_{\mu}\varphi}{f_{\gamma}}\bar{f}\gamma^{\mu}\gamma_{5}f \qquad (2)$$

By comparing $(1)$ and $(2)$ I have completely different interactions between $\varphi$ and $ff$. For example, I don't have term $c_{\varphi ff}m_{f}\frac{\varphi}{f_{\gamma}}\bar{f}\gamma_{5}f$. Where is the problem?

An edit. The problem has simple solution: an interaction of form $\varphi \bar{f}\gamma_{5}f$ isn't induced by loops (at least of order $\frac{1}{f_{\gamma}}$) because of approximate shift symmetry of underlying lagrangian.

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$y$\varnothing$icsOverflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.