Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,355 answers , 22,793 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  CFTs in the phase space of QFTs

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
1322 views

In the cases I have encountered a CFT is often realised as a RG fixed POINT of the RG flow. Is it also possible to have a whole family/mine/manifold of CFTs instead?

This post is imported from Physics StackExchange at 2016-06-02 04:57 (UTC) posted by SE User Anne O' Nyme. SE users associated with first four comments below are Gennaro Tedesco, ACuriousMind, user2309840 and Edward Hughes respectively.

asked Jun 2, 2016 in Theoretical Physics by Anne O'Nyme (175 points) [ revision history ]
recategorized Jun 2, 2016 by dimension10

"a CFT is often realised as a RG fixed POINT of the RG flow": what cases thereof have you encountered? Simple families of CFT arise from chiral theories in low dimensions as well.

It's not exactly clear to me what you're asking. Fixed points are points. It sounds as if you're asking if a point can be a manifold instead, which doesn't make much sense to me.

Maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory in 3+1 dimensions is an example of a conformal field theory. It is conformal for all values of the Yang-Mills coupling. Thus, one could think of the Yang-Mills coupling as parametrizing a line of CFTs. More generally, a manifold of CFTs can be parametrized by the space of exactly marginal couplings.

You should clarify your question. If you are asking for examples of CFTs which are valid at any value of the coupling(s) then user2309840 has given a good answer above.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOv$\varnothing$rflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...