Register

Adv. Query

Q&A (4871)

Reviews (203)

Open problems (47)
Meta (439)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,789 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

What is the state-of-the-art on spacelike singularities in string theory?

1683 views

What lessons do we have from string theory regarding the fate of singularities in general relativity?

What happens to black hole singularities? What happens to cosmological singularities?

Which points of view on string theory yielded results in this respect? String field theory? AdS/CFT? Matrix theory? I suppose perturbative string theory is not applicable in the vicinity of singularities.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

asked Oct 26, 2011 in Phenomenology by Squark (1,725 points) [ revision history ]
recategorized May 7, 2014 by dimension10

Is there a way to narrow this down? The story of timelike singularities (orbifolds, conifolds etc.) is well digested and you are asking for a review of thousands of papers. Are you maybe interested in more specific types of singularities?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

commented Oct 26, 2011 by Moshe (2,405 points) [ no revision ]

Well, I mentioned black hole and cosmological singularities which are spacelike. Indeed I'm interested only in the spacelike case.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

commented Oct 26, 2011 by Squark (1,725 points) [ no revision ]

Excellent, thanks, this does narrow it down quite a bit...

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

commented Oct 26, 2011 by Moshe (2,405 points) [ no revision ]

Also, my 1st sentence alludes to the classical problem of singularities in general relativity which a theory of quantum gravity is supposed to solve. Compactification on singular manifolds (which I think you're referring to) is a way to introduce an additional sort of singularities special to string theory (more generally Kaluza-Klein) and unnecessary in classical general relativity.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

commented Oct 26, 2011 by Squark (1,725 points) [ no revision ]

That’s kind of semantics, but spacelike singularities is definitely a well-defined characterization.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

commented Oct 26, 2011 by Moshe (2,405 points) [ no revision ]

Dear @Squark, you may get links to dozens of brave papers but I think that except for the authors, mostly everyone will agree that nothing solid has been derived from string theory about spacelike singularities at all so if you get some "constructive answer", it could already mislead you in a direction that was predetermined by how you formulated your question...

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

commented Oct 28, 2011 by Luboš Motl (10,278 points) [ no revision ]

Does it mean we can't answer even the most basic questions? For example: AdS/CFT is supposed to describe quantum gravity on asymptotically anti-De Sitter spacetime. Apparently it includes spacetimes of different topology. Does it include spacetimes with an initial cosmological singularity and asymptotically anti-De Sitter future?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

commented Nov 5, 2011 by Squark (1,725 points) [ no revision ]

Your comment on this question:

To answer, leave an answer instead. Comments are usually for non-answers.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
To alert a user, please use the "@" command and remove spaces from the username, example, the user "John Doe" should be pinged as "@JohnDoe", while the user "Johndoe" should be pinged as "@Johndoe". The post author is always automatically pinged (unless you are the post author).
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.

Live preview (may slow down editor) Preview

Your name to display (optional):

Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine:

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

Anti-spam verification:

[captcha placeholder]

Please complete the anti-spam verification

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.

Live preview (may slow down editor) Preview

Your name to display (optional):

Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on:

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

Anti-spam verification:

If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).

Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights

...