Quantcast
Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.
W3Counter Web Stats

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public β tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

208 submissions , 166 unreviewed
5,138 questions , 2,258 unanswered
5,414 answers , 23,090 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
823 active unimported users
More ...

  Does this asymptotic series appear anywhere in physics?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
1315 views

I recently discovered the following relation for arbitrary dr:

limklimn nr=1dr(f(knr)kn)1ζ(s)r=1drrsremovable singularity×0f(x)dx

As s1 and f(x)dx absolutely converges and f()=f(0)=0

Some obvious choices are dr=1 , dr=srrs or dr=δ1,rs1 where the R.H.S 0. Is there any possible use of this? (I was thinking along the lines of divergent series in QFT). I know this relation looks very bizzare so I've added a proof:

Proof
---

Consider an integral such that 0f(x)dx=C,where, f(x) is a smooth and continuous function and absolutely converges.

Now we raise both sides to the power s:

(0f(x)dx)s=Cs

We substitute x with rx to get:

(0f(rx)dx)s=(C/r)s

Multiplying both sides by an arbitrary coefficient:

(br)(0f(rx)dx)s=(br)(C/r)s

Taking their sum:

r=1br(0f(rx)dx)s=Csr=1brrsdirichlet series

We write the integral as a limit of a Riemann sum:

r=1limklimn br(nx=1f(kxnr)kn)s=Csr=1brrs

Using the mobius inversion formula:

r=1limklimn br(nx=1f(kxnr)kn)s=Cs1ζ(s)r=1drrs


We define dr=e|rbe

Note:

(b11s+b22s+b33s+b44s+)×(11s+12s+13s+14s+)=b11s+b1+b22s+b1+b33s+b1+b2+b44s+

Now focusing on the L.H.S (s1):

r=1limklimn br(nx=1f(kxnr)kn)sr=1limklimn br(nx=1f(kxnr)kn)


Focusing on the R.H.S of the asymptote:

limnb1((f(kn)+f(2kn)+f(3kn)+f(4kn)+)kn
+
limnb2(0.f(kn)+f(2kn)+0.f(3kn)+f(4kn)+)kn
+

 
=limn(b1d1(f(kn)+(b1+b2)d2f(2kn)+(b1+b3)d3f(3kn)+(b1+b2+b4)d4f(4kn)+)kn

Hence, for special dr the R.H.S converges:

limklimn nr=1dr(f(knr)kn)lims11ζ(s)r=1drrsremovable singularity×0f(x)dx
    

asked Jan 15, 2017 in Mathematics by Asaint (90 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jan 15, 2017 by Arnold Neumaier

 Is there any possible use of this? - Most likely the way you arrived at the consideration of this realtion hints at where possible uses are. How did you discover the formula?

Long answer: I arrived at this via consideration of a certain basis and realized that I could create this formula. Short answer: pure mathematics (which I was hoping could be applied to something). Also one of my friends said it might be useful for some path integral as it is essentially a limit of a sum of some kind.

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

Let me quickly brainstorm at what this might be useful for in physics. Let us first take the n limit of the expression

limklimn nr=1dr(f(knr)kn)

This is simply a Riemann integral which reads

limk0D(x)f(kx)kdx

where D(x) will be some kind of horrible random distribution of the sort of white noise. What I mean by horrible is that it can be obtained as an infinitely tight packing of delta functions which have the value dr at the respective limiting points. By a simple substitution we can rewrite this integral as

limk0D(xk)f(x)dx0˜D(x)f(x)dx

which only increases the tight-packing of the peaks of D to a new formal distribution ˜D.

Hence, in principle, I guess this kind of formula might be useful to consider in the following type of situation. We have a stochastic-differential process characterized by ˜D(x), and we are able to step-by-step derive the properties of the sequence dr; we can then use your formula e.g. to compute some f(x)-momenta or mean values of some observables.

answered Jan 16, 2017 by Void (1,645 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jan 16, 2017 by Void

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol in the following word:
pysicsverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...