Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

158 submissions , 130 unreviewed
4,148 questions , 1,535 unanswered
5,003 answers , 21,241 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
582 active unimported users
More ...

  Physical Meaning of $spin_{ \mathbb{C}}$ Structure

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
122 views

I have been studying the $spin_{ \mathbb{C}}$ structure. Is that true that the $U(1)$ part represents the $U(1)$ gauge field in physics? If this is indeed the physical meaning of the $U(1)$ part, is there any generalization for $SU(2)$-gauge theory?

It turned out that for a spinor field interacting with gauge field, the mathematical description is called "twisted bundle", which is introduced in section 12.6.2 in Nakahara. Now I believe that the $U(1)$ part of $spin_{ \mathbb{C}}$ is not the actual ordinary $U(1)$ gauge field. In classical field theory, the spinor field should be grassmann number-valued. Are there any books explaining more details about grassmann number-valued spinor bundles?

asked Mar 7 in Theoretical Physics by New Student (140 points) [ revision history ]
edited Mar 7 by New Student

3 Answers

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

A possible answer is given at the following post

https://physicsoverflow.org/33037/physical-derivation-applications-mayer-integrality-theorem

In such post the $spin_{ \mathbb{C}}$ structure is generalized to 

In such post some physical examples are presented.

answered Mar 7 by juancho (1,030 points) [ no revision ]

Thank you.

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

The $U(1)$ part of $Spin^c$ is the electromagnetic field. The point is that for fermionic wavefunctions to be well-defined, around every contractible loop it has to be antiperiodic. Singular curves around which it's periodic instead can be removed by placing $\pi$ units of magnetic flux there.

answered Mar 8 by Ryan Thorngren (1,895 points) [ no revision ]
+ 1 like - 0 dislike

Please consider the following theorem

According with such theorem, $w_{2}(X)$ is a topological obstruction or topological accident or topological wound  which does not permit the existence of spinors on $X$.  In order to heal the topological wound of $X$ a magnetic monopole  is introduced via the cohomological flux  $c$.  With such therapy, now $X$ admits the existence of spinors.·

answered Mar 9 by juancho (1,030 points) [ no revision ]

Thank you very much for your answer. Could you also leave a comment about the grassmann number nature of classical spinors? How to construct a grassmann number-valued spinor bundle?

Please tell me the reference textbook of the theorem.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOverf$\varnothing$ow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...