• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,037 questions , 2,191 unanswered
5,344 answers , 22,706 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  What predictions are made by asymptotically safe gravity?

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

Various researchers are working on asymptotically safe gravity. If the idea is correct, what are the experimental consequences? How can the idea be tested in experiment?

asked Dec 25, 2018 in Theoretical Physics by Clarisa [ no revision ]

The same as any other quantum theory of gravity, the direct predictions of the theory are at the Planck scales and for anything well below that we can be quite happy with tree-level quantum gravity. But you get these consistency criteria for asymptotic safety which constrain possible standard models, there is a pretty famous prediction of the Higgs boson mass. Taking this prediction at face value, the other, implicit prediction of that paper is that there are no other particles other than the Standard model. (But that would still leave neutrino mass and inflation unanswered, so I do not think this is to be taken too seriously.)

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

My impression is that the observed Higgs potential is not in fact compatible with asymptotic safety.

See the discussion at ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Higgs+field#AsymtoticSafetyOrNot summarizing p. 17-18 of

  • Dario Buttazzo, Giuseppe Degrassi, Pier Paolo Giardino, Gian Giudice, Filippo Sala, Alberto Salvio, Alessandro Strumia, "Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson", JHEP12(2013)089 (arXiv:1307.3536)

What is the case is that the observed Higgs potential stands out as being right on the line of meta-stability ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Higgs+field#MassAndVacuumInstability

This is compatible with asymptotic safety to first order. But it does not seem to be compatible to higher orders.

answered Dec 26, 2018 by Urs Schreiber [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights