Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

176 submissions , 139 unreviewed
4,330 questions , 1,659 unanswered
5,092 answers , 21,632 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
641 active unimported users
More ...

  Why does the Phi-cubed theory have no ground state?

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
98 views

In the book of Sredinicki's, he claimed that the $\phi^3$ theory has no ground state, hence this is not a physical theory.
My question is that I can't see why this system has no ground state. And I don't understand either the explaination he gave. For example, what does "roll down the hill" really mean? What's the case for a harmonic oscillator pertuibed by a "q^3" term? Maybe it's better if someone can explain it using the quantum harmonic case.

image
 

asked Feb 23 in Theoretical Physics by andy95220 (5 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

Sredinicki means the exact $\phi^3$ theory. If you understand the exact solutions to the exact "harmonic oscillator stuffed with $x^3$ term", then you can get a gist of a field theory where the occupation numbers replace continuous $x$ of harminic oscillator problem.

If you do not understand the exact solutions to the exact "harmonic oscillator stuffed with $x^3$ term", then you may consider an infinite reflecting wall  $U(x)= 0,\; x<0,\; U(x)=+\infty,\; x\ge0$ as an example where the solutions are not localized. (There is a "ground state" with $E=0$, though.)

A "cubic oscillator" with big $g$ is similar to a slightly inclined wall (still reflecting), but with no "bottom" for negative-valued $x$, so there is no minimal $E_0$ for such a potential, no ground state, no localization.

answered Feb 24 by Vladimir Kalitvianski (132 points) [ revision history ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOver$\varnothing$low
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...