# The classical limit of a QFT in deformation quantization

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
1238 views

I'm not sure if I understand the following correctly, but it seems to have appeared implicitly in my studies.

If $Z_{cl}$, $Z_p$, and $Z_\hbar$ are the classical, perturbative to arbitrary order, and full nonperturbative solutions to the generating function of some quantum field theory, then the three functions arise as (approximate) solutions to a Schrödinger-like equation of the form
$$y'(x)=f(x)\star y(x)$$
for some definition of the star product. To my knowledge $Z_p$ is reproduced (derived?) by the solution to the above ODE with Picard's method, and moreover if one takes the limit $\hbar\to 0$ either beforehand or in the perturbative solution, one obtains $Z_{cl}$. However if one solves it first then takes the limit, there is some ambiguity with convention and the classical solution is not obtained:
$$\lim_{\hbar\to 0}Z_\hbar \neq Z_{cl} = \lim_{\hbar\to 0 } Z_p$$
I've heard the first equation as an explanation for why the perturbation series is riddled with divergences (i.e. the generating function has a discontinuity at $\hbar=0$, among other reasons), but haven't seen something substantive on the topic.

How does one recover the classical solution and perturbative series given $Z_\hbar$? A Taylor series doesn't seem to work because of the discontinuity.

This pathology can be rewritten in terms of the star product itself i.e. star product doesn't nicely converge $\implies$ $Z$ doesn't converge nicely either (at least for one definition of the star product).
 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsOv$\varnothing$rflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.