Register

Adv. Query

Q&A (4870)

Reviews (203)

Open problems (47)
Meta (439)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,789 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

String theory allows chiral gauge coupling

1087 views

In Polchinski String Vol 1:

Chiral gauge couplings. The gauge interactions in nature are parity asymmetric (chiral). This has been a stumbling block for a number of previous unifying ideas: they required parity symmetric gauge couplings. String theory allows chiral gauge couplings.

What are the approaches from String theory allowing chiral gauge couplings?

Can experts sketch and enumerate all of the different ideas?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-12-07 19:34 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart

asked Oct 17, 2020 in Theoretical Physics by annie marie heart (1,205 points) [ no revision ]

The gauge interactions in nature are parity asymmetric (chiral). Is there parity asymmetry in QCD?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-12-07 19:34 (UTC), posted by SE-user G. Smith

commented Oct 17, 2020 by G. Smith (60 points) [ no revision ]

>> parity asymmetry in QCD. Ans: No

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-12-07 19:34 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart

commented Oct 17, 2020 by annie marie heart (1,205 points) [ no revision ]

So I don’t understand this sweeping statement about “the gauge interactions in nature”, which seems plainly wrong. Why didn’t Polchinski write “some gauge interactions in nature”? Is there some context that you omitted?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-12-07 19:34 (UTC), posted by SE-user G. Smith

commented Oct 17, 2020 by G. Smith (60 points) [ no revision ]

He meant the whole gauge interaction violates P. I just copy paste

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-12-07 19:34 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart

commented Oct 18, 2020 by annie marie heart (1,205 points) [ no revision ]

Your comment on this question:

To answer, leave an answer instead. Comments are usually for non-answers.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
To alert a user, please use the "@" command and remove spaces from the username, example, the user "John Doe" should be pinged as "@JohnDoe", while the user "Johndoe" should be pinged as "@Johndoe". The post author is always automatically pinged (unless you are the post author).
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.

Live preview (may slow down editor) Preview

Your name to display (optional):

Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine:

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

Anti-spam verification:

[captcha placeholder]

Please complete the anti-spam verification

1 Answer

Is there a classification of all theories belonging to the string landscape with chiral gauge couplings? No, we are far from such a precise knowledge of the string theory landscape.

Nevertheless, a sample of representative approaches can be mentioned:

1) Heterotic string compactifications on Calabi-Yau: See Chiral four-dimensional heterotic strings from self-dual lattices.

2) Four-dimensional $N=1$ superconformal quiver gauge theories: See brane tillings and their applications. The simplest cases of this class of theories are dicussed in the case of local Calabi-Yau, however, they model the local behaviour of a wide class of semi-realistic theories.

3) Intersecting branes setups: See the excellent review https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0502005.

4) F-theory compactifications: See the outstanding A Quadrillion Standard Models from F-theory.

5) Strings on orbifold geometries: See strings on orbifolds.

Just to mention a few.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-12-07 19:34 (UTC), posted by SE-user Ramiro Hum-Sah

answered Oct 18, 2020 by Ramiro Hum-Sah (80 points) [ no revision ]

Your comment on this answer:

To answer, leave an answer instead. Comments are usually for non-answers.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
To alert a user, please use the "@" command and remove spaces from the username, example, the user "John Doe" should be pinged as "@JohnDoe", while the user "Johndoe" should be pinged as "@Johndoe". The post author is always automatically pinged (unless you are the post author).
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.

Live preview (may slow down editor) Preview

Your name to display (optional):

Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine:

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

Anti-spam verification:

[captcha placeholder]

Please complete the anti-spam verification

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.

Live preview (may slow down editor) Preview

Your name to display (optional):

Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on:

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

Anti-spam verification:

If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsO$\varnothing$erflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).

Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights

...