Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

206 submissions , 164 unreviewed
5,103 questions , 2,249 unanswered
5,355 answers , 22,800 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Boundary (Anti)Periodic conditions and fermion partition functions

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
1361 views

The path integral with antiperiodic fermions (Neveu-Schwarz spin structure) on a circle of circumference $\beta$, in a theory with Hamiltonian $H$, has partition function $$ \rm{Tr} \exp(−\beta H)$$ The path integral with periodic fermions (Ramond spin structure) has partition function $$ \rm{Tr} (−1)^F \exp(−\beta H). $$

  1. Why antiperiodic and periodic boundary conditions give these two partition functions? Intuitions and derivations?

  2. How are the two boundary conditions related to spin structures? (Ramond and Neveu-Schwarz spin structures)

  3. What are the ground state sectors (bosonic vs fermionic) for the above boundary conditions?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-12-12 20:05 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
asked Oct 25, 2020 in Theoretical Physics by annie marie heart (1,205 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

I have some insight on the first question. For the ordinary partition function: $$ \text{Tr} \ e^{-\beta H} = \sum_n \langle n | e^{-\beta H} | n \rangle $$ Then one inserts the fermionic path integral: $$ \int dc \ dc^{*} e^{-c c^{*}}\sum_n \langle n| c \rangle \langle c | e^{-\beta H} | n \rangle = \int dc \ dc^{*} e^{-c c^{*}} \sum_n \langle -c | e^{-\beta H} | n \rangle \langle n| c \rangle = \int dc \ dc^{*} e^{-c c^{*}} \langle -c | e^{-\beta H} | c \rangle $$ Where one has used : $\langle n | c \rangle \langle c | n \rangle = -\langle c | n \rangle \langle n | c \rangle$.

Then one inserts resolution of identity $N$ times (here $c_N = -c_0$): $$ \int \prod dc_n dc_n^{*} e^{-\sum_n c_n c_n^{*}} \langle c_N | e^{-\Delta \tau H} | c_{N-1} \rangle \ldots \langle c_1 | e^{-\Delta \tau H} | c_{0} \rangle $$ Where $\tau = \beta / N$. In the continuum limit one gets the path integral after: $$ \Delta \tau \sum_n^{N} \ldots \rightarrow \int_0^{\beta} d \tau \ldots \qquad \prod_n dc_n dc_n^{*} \rightarrow \mathcal{D} c \mathcal{D} c^{*} \qquad \frac{c_n - c_{n-1}}{\Delta \tau} \rightarrow \partial_\tau $$ $$ Z = \int \mathcal{D} c \mathcal{D} c^{*} e^{-\int_0^{\beta} d \tau \ L (c, c^{*})} $$ With the boundary condition $c(\beta) = - c(0)$.

For the Witten index: $$ \text{Tr} \ (-1)^{F} e^{-\beta H} $$ One uses the anticommutation of $(-1)^{F}$ with fermions: $$ \{(-1)^{F}, c\} = 0 $$ Proceeding as above, but and evaluating $(-1)^{F}$ on a particular state, one gets now: $$ \langle c | e^{-\beta H} | n \rangle \langle n| c \rangle $$ And after the insertions of identity the path integral with $c(\beta) = c(0)$

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-12-12 20:05 (UTC), posted by SE-user spiridon_the_sun_rotator
answered Oct 29, 2020 by spiridon_the_sun_rotator (70 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$y$\varnothing$icsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...