Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,789 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Mass gap and $N=4$ SYM

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
775 views

I am confused about the role of the mass gap conjecture for $N=4$ SYM. The beta function is zero at all loops so how can the theory develop an energy scale? Does the mass gap conjecture only applies to non-supersymmetric theories? Thanks!

asked Feb 25, 2021 in Q&A by anonymous [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

N=4 SYM is superconformal and so does not have a mass gap (more precisely, this argument applies at the superconformal point: it is also possible to give expectation values to the scalar fields ("to go on the Coulomb branch"), which breaks superconformal invariance, but there is still no mass gap as there are massless abelian gauge bosons).

In general, the infrared behavior of a non-abelian gauge theory (supersymmetric or not) is a non-trivial question.

The mass gap conjecture says only that "pure" non-abelian gauge theory, i.e. with only non-abelian gauge bosons and no extra matter, has a mass gap. A generalization is that non-abelian gauge theory coupled to a "few" quarks in the fundamental representation (like QCD) has a mass gap. But it is not general: for example, for SU(N) gauge theory with N_f quarks, it is expected that in an appropriate scaling limit of N and N_f (search for Banks-Zaks fixed point), the infrared theory is controlled by a non-trivial conformal field theory and so in particular does not have a mass gap.

The infrared behavior of non-abelian gauge theories is much better understood in the supersymmetric case: see the work of Seiberg on N=1 SYM (including topics like Seiberg dualities).

answered Feb 26, 2021 by 40227 (5,140 points) [ revision history ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\varnothing$ysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...