Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

206 submissions , 164 unreviewed
5,103 questions , 2,249 unanswered
5,355 answers , 22,800 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Could torus spaces (defined by Planck length) exist?

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
503 views

Let $\epsilon_c$ denote critical energy density, $\epsilon_t$ energy mass density at time $t$, $c$ the speed of light, $G$ the gravitational constant, $H=\dot a/ a$ the Hubble parameter, $\Lambda$ the cosmological constant, $\ell_p$ Planck length, and $E_p$ Planck energy. From the first order Friedmann equation,
\begin{equation}
    H^2=\frac{8\pi G}{3 c^2}\left(\epsilon_t+\epsilon_\Lambda\right)-\frac{\kappa c^2}{R^2_0 a},
\end{equation}
and the quantum field theoretical assumption that, letting $V_\mu\left(\ell_p\right)$ denote the Planck volume,
\begin{equation*}
    \begin{split}
        \epsilon_\Lambda &= \frac{\Lambda c^2}{8\pi G},\\
        &\equiv \frac{E_p}{V_\mu\left(\ell_p\right)},
    \end{split}
\end{equation*}
we may define $\epsilon_c=\epsilon_t$ when curvature $\kappa=0$:
\begin{equation}
    \epsilon_c=\frac{3c^2}{8\pi G}H^2-\frac{E_p}{V_\mu\left(\ell_p\right)}.
\end{equation}


There exists a closed manifold $\mu$ such that 
    \begin{equation}
        V_\mu\left(\ell_p\right)=\frac{8\pi G E_p}{3c^2 H^2-8\pi G\epsilon_c}.
    \end{equation}

Let $\mu$ denote a torus (as a closed, compact 2–manifold). It should be noted that any topological space homeomorphic to a torus may be considered with the same treatment. The Planck volume is then,
    \begin{equation*}
        \begin{split}
            V_\mu\left(\ell_p\right)&=2\pi^2 R\left(\frac{\ell_p}{2}\right)^2,\\
            &=\frac{G R\hslash\pi^2}{2c^3}.
        \end{split}
    \end{equation*}
    The outer radius of $\mu$ is denoted by $\frac{\ell_p}{2}$. If $0<\frac{\ell_p}{2}<<1$ denoted the inner radius, then $\mu$ degenerates into a double-covered sphere with radius $R$, which yields an undesirable $\Lambda$. Equating with (3) yields
    \begin{equation}
        R=\frac{16 E_p c^3}{\hslash\pi\left(3c^2 H^2-8\pi G\epsilon_c\right)}.
    \end{equation}
    Given observational data, whereby $\epsilon_c\approx7.8\cdot10^{-10}J m^{-3}$,
    \begin{equation*}
        R\approx 1.9265995345\cdot10^{48} m.
    \end{equation*}

The outer radius would then be approximately $2\cdot10^{32}$ light years. A space of these 'tori' could technically exist since packing densities are higher than that of spheres (one could conjecture this as a minimum possible size of the universe – assuming total size is at least $3\cdot10^{23}$ times larger than the observable). So, how could this be disproven? What implications would such a large outer radius have on other areas of physics and cosmology (seems absurd that the Planck length could describe such a large region of space – in terms of radii, not volume)? I would be grateful for any help on this.

asked Jul 21, 2021 in Theoretical Physics by jday [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar\varnothing$sicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...