Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,789 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Is the category of Z^* algebras equivalent to the category of C^* algebras?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
1008 views

A  Z*  algebra is a  C^* algebra whose all positive elements are zero divisor.

The family of all Z^* algebras with C^* morphisms forms a category.

Is the category of  Z^* algebras equivalent to the category of C^* algebras?

If the answer would be positive then the theory of C* algebras can be reduced to study of Z^* algebras

The equivalence of two categories is meant in the following sense:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_categories#Definition

asked Mar 29, 2023 in Mathematics by AliTaghaviMath (145 points) [ revision history ]
edited Apr 1, 2023 by AliTaghaviMath

What is the relevance for physics?

@ArnoldNeumaier  Thank you and my +1 for your comment.

May be a more general question would be "What is the relevance of  C^* algebras for physics?" so with the same motivations one can consider some possible physical interpretations for Z^* algebras. Any way there are a some pure math tags in Physicsoverflow but there are physical interpretations for those subject

@ArnoldNeumaier  I think that if we have some topology-dynamical interpretation for this concept, then actualy we have a physical interpretation too.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOve$\varnothing$flow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...