Register

Adv. Query

Q&A (4871)

Reviews (203)

Open problems (47)
Meta (439)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,789 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

Axiomatic string theory?

668 views

There have been many proposal of a mathematical definition of Quantum Field Theory, for instance through Wightman or Osterwalder-Schrader axioms. Were there any efforts toward doing the same for String theory?

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2023-11-25 20:57 (UTC), posted by SE-user Giafazio

asked Mar 9, 2022 in Theoretical Physics by Giafazio (25 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Nov 25, 2023

No, string theory is not a "theory" based on a set of rules that may then be defined axiomatically. In that sense it is altogether different from quantum field theory.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2023-11-25 20:57 (UTC), posted by SE-user Carlo Beenakker

commented Mar 9, 2022 by Carlo Beenakker (180 points) [ no revision ]

QFT is a part of mathematics produced mostly by mathematicians while String Theory is not. Various people produce results which are thought to belong to ST, but these are just individual results.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2023-11-25 20:57 (UTC), posted by SE-user markvs

commented Mar 9, 2022 by markvs (0 points) [ no revision ]

@CarloBeenakker Could you elaborate a little why this is so?

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2023-11-25 20:57 (UTC), posted by SE-user Jules Lamers

commented Mar 9, 2022 by Jules Lamers (0 points) [ no revision ]

@markvs Surely the standard model and what all those people do at CERN is physics‽ There are some very special examples of QFTs (non-interacting, topological, conformal, ...) that have become part of mathematics, but QFT is certainly physics. In fact, one could argue the opposite of what you say: QFT has produced experimentally testable predictions; afaik, if anything, string theory has so far produced more mathematics than any real physics (I do not know if applications of AdS/CFT to the quark-gluon plasma or condensed matter theory produced new results that can be tested by experiments)

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2023-11-25 20:57 (UTC), posted by SE-user Jules Lamers

commented Mar 9, 2022 by Jules Lamers (0 points) [ no revision ]

In CERN, they discovered Higgs boson, which is indeed, a confirmation of some mathematical result. But math part of ST is just a union of disjoint facts unlike QFT, IMHO.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2023-11-25 20:57 (UTC), posted by SE-user markvs

commented Mar 9, 2022 by markvs (0 points) [ no revision ]

Your comment on this question:

To answer, leave an answer instead. Comments are usually for non-answers.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
To alert a user, please use the "@" command and remove spaces from the username, example, the user "John Doe" should be pinged as "@JohnDoe", while the user "Johndoe" should be pinged as "@Johndoe". The post author is always automatically pinged (unless you are the post author).
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.

Live preview (may slow down editor) Preview

Your name to display (optional):

Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine:

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

Anti-spam verification:

[captcha placeholder]

Please complete the anti-spam verification

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.

Live preview (may slow down editor) Preview

Your name to display (optional):

Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on:

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

Anti-spam verification:

If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOverfl$\varnothing$w
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).

Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights

...