Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.
Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.
PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!
New printer friendly PO pages!
Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!
Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!
Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!
... see more
(propose a free ad)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310440778_The_Standard_Model_Coupled_to_Quantum_Gravitodyn
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280940773_EXISTENCE_OF_NON-TRIVIAL_YANG-MILLS_THEORY_ON_R4
http://www.stat.physik.uni-potsdam.de/~pikovsky/teaching/stud_seminar/Classical_Yang_Mills.pdf
The community judgment is that in spite of the claims in the first two papers, nothing of importance is solved. Otherwise there would be a large number of citations. In scholar.google.com, the first paper has only 3, all self-citations. The second is unpublished, has no citations, and is not even on the arXiv.
The third paper is published and reasonably well cited, but it is on classical Yang-Mills in 1+1d, well-known stuff.
The problem is a philosophical one, probably, it will be closed, rather as out of date, than solved one.
|The first two articles provide a complete answer indeed.
user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required