Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,789 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Can we index chats by question?

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
1668 views

The chats might be useful, this sometimes happens when people have an informal discussion. Perhaps it is good if the chats are always attached to a category of some kind, a tag? you want to have a generic chat about a subject, then attach the chat to the most specific tag you can find.

The easiest way to implement this is to make a heirarchical tag system, where every question gets a tag, every followup question gets a subtag, and related questions get a category tag, and so on. A question can have additional tags, but it should have a main place in the tree. Then the tree-structure of the tags follow the tree structure of the questions, with additional tags that represent domains of interest, subfields, and fields. Then there would be higher level tags, like "The KPZ equation", which contain all the questions related to this equation, and low level tags "How does Hairer's solution to KPZ equation resemble the heuristic analysis?" (lower level question, and also tag), and even lower level tags "How does equation 3.11 in Hairer's paper compatible with the analysis in KPZ 86?". Then a discussion can choose any one tag or tags from the tree to insert itself, this is the primary tag that locates the discussion, with additional secondary tags which are like soft-links.

This way, a person can look at all questions/submissions/answers/discussions under a given tag, and find all the relevant material. It is important for the site's future growth, without fine-grained compartmentalization, the site is bounded in size to what a person can memorize.

I know this is not so simple to implement, but it would be useful if the site is to be unlimited. Stackexchange is grossly limited in it's ability to scale up to thousands of users, it functions best when there are hundreds of users and dozens of questions daily, not tens of thousands of users, and hundreds of submissions daily. I think we should be focused on being capable of handling the heavier load, because, you know, if you build it, they will come.

asked Feb 25, 2014 in Feature Request by Ron Maimon (7,730 points) [ no revision ]
recategorized Mar 18, 2014 by dimension10

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOverf$\varnothing$ow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...