# Spectra of the Type II String theories

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
140 views

The spectrum of the Type II string theory (both IIA and IIB) is given by: \begin{array}{*{20}{c}} \hline & {{\text{Sector}}}& & {{\text{Spectrum}}}& & {{\text{Massless Fields}}} & \\ \hline & {{\text{R}} - \operatorname{R} }& & {{{\mathbf{8}}_s} \otimes {{\mathbf{8}}_s}}& & {{C_0},{C_1},{C_2},{C_3}{C_4},...} & \\ \hline & {{\text{NS}} - {\text{NS}}}& & {{{\mathbf{8}}_v} \otimes {{\mathbf{8}}_v}}& & {{g_{\mu \nu }},{F_{\mu \nu }},\Phi ,...} & \\ \hline & {{\text{R}} - {\text{NS}}}& & {{{\mathbf{8}}_s} \otimes {{\mathbf{8}}_v}}& & {{{\Psi '}_\mu },\lambda ',...} & \\ \hline & {{\text{NS}} - {\text{R}}}& & {{{\mathbf{8}}_v} \otimes {{\mathbf{8}}_s}}& & {{\Psi _\mu },\lambda ,...} & \hline \end{array}

I know that for the Ramond-Ramond fields, the even ones belong to the Type IIB string theory and the odd ones belong to the Type IIA string theory.

But what about the rest? Are they there in both Type II string theories? I think it should be the case, because the choice of the GSO projection is only for the R-R sector.

edited Apr 25, 2014

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

The NS-NS sector is the same in type IIA and IIB, but the R-NS and NS-R sectors differ. The type IIA theory is non-chiral, so the R-NS and NS-R fields transform in $\mathbf{8}_s \otimes \mathbf{8}_v$ and $\mathbf{8}_v \otimes \mathbf{8}_s'$, where $\mathbf{8}_s$ and $\mathbf{8}_s'$ are the two eight-dimensional spinor representations of $SO(8)$. Type IIB, on the other hand, is a chiral theory where the R-NS and NS-R fields are constructed from the same spinor representation, so $\mathbf{8}_s \otimes \mathbf{8}_v$ and $\mathbf{8}_v \otimes \mathbf{8}_s$.

Similarly, the R-R sector of IIA is given by $\mathbf{8}_s \otimes \mathbf{8}_s'$, while in the IIB case it is given by $\mathbf{8}_s \otimes \mathbf{8}_s$.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-09 09:15 (UCT), posted by SE-user Olof
answered May 12, 2013 by (210 points)
Thanks! So, they simply have different dilatino fields and gravitino fields, right? P.S. I think the 8_v in the first one should be "prime" also.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-09 09:15 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dimensio1n0
Yes, the chiralities of the fermions differs in the two theories (and the RR fields). But I'm not sure what you mean by a prime on 8_v. 8_v is the real vector representation of SO(8), and there is only one such irrep. There are two spinors 8_s and 8_s', of different chirality.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-09 09:15 (UCT), posted by SE-user Olof
Oops! Forgot that! Sorry

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-09 09:15 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dimensio1n0

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsOv$\varnothing$rflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.