Hi Drake, I did not moderate anything so far, heck such tasks should not be my business at all, at least not in the long run. But we should elect by the physics community for their knowledge and achievements respected moderators
http://www.physicsoverflow.org/6197/who-wants-to-help-us-as-should-be-a-moderator?show=6197#q6197
However what is true is, that since Dimension10 and I started to discuss about a new higher-level physics site on TRF, its goal was always to be some kind of revival of TP.SE and a little physics brother of MathOverflow, to which Ron added the idea of the Reviews section which is really great.
For this to become true in the long run, it is not partcularly helfpful if Ron calls nice former contributors of TP.SE we happily obtain back, names such as morons and other names .... We still need to attract more professional physicists such that questions as they have been asked on TP.SE can be answered with a higher percentage.
So all I did is express my disagreement about this name calling to Ron and explaining that in order to proof bad physics wrong (even in strong words!), name calling of people (such as JonLester we are happy to attract to PhysicsOverflow) is not needed.
I am rather astonished that you so strongly disagree with this defending the original goals of PhysicsOverflow and expressing harmless but clear disagreement with for things that are not needed to drive home any physics point, such explicite name calling...
You know, not even Lumo did this on TP.SE, whereas on TRF he calls things and people by their proper names and I personally often rather agree with him.