Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,054 questions , 2,207 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,720 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Electric charges on compact four-manifolds

+ 9 like - 0 dislike
3894 views

Textbook wisdom in electromagnetism tells you that there is no total electric charge on a compact manifold. For example, consider space-time of the form $\mathbb{R} \times M_3$ where the first factor is time. One defines the total charge via $Q(M_3) = \int_{M_3} \star j$ where $d\star F = \star j$ is the electric current. If $M_3$ has no boundary (e.g. if it is compact) one can use Stokes' theorem to argue that $$ Q(M_3) = \int_{M_3} d\star F = \int_{\partial M_3} \star F = 0.$$

I wonder what happens for general four-manifolds $M_4$, especially in the case that the third Betti number is zero (otherwise one can simply integrate over a three-cycle). Is there a sensible way to define charge in the above sense? Can one argue that it has to vanish if $\partial M_4 = 0$?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-09-29 16:53 (UTC), posted by SE-user jws
asked Sep 29, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by jws (45 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

The total charge is only defined on a spatial slice, but on any compact spatial slice your argument shows that the total charge is zero. A nice way of imagining this is to ask yourself "in the case of some charge excess, where would the extra field lines go?"

By the way, this fact can actually be violated in the case where there is some ABJ anomaly. For example in the background of a flat photon field one doesn't see any chiral current non-conservation, but if one considers the total charge on a compact spatial slice where the photon field has a non-trivial Chern-Simons invariant, then this invariant equals the total charge! This is a global manifestation of the chiral anomaly.

answered Sep 29, 2014 by Ryan Thorngren (1,925 points) [ revision history ]

To add some references to this statement: chiral anomaly.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...