Basically, I want to know how one can see the SL(2,R)×SL(2,R) symmetry of AdS3 explicitly.
AdS3 can be defined as hyperboloid in R2,2 as
X2−1+X20−X21−X22=L2
where
L is the AdS radius. Since the metric of
R2,2,
ds2=−dX2−1−dX20+dX21+dX22,
is invariant under
SO(2,2) transformations and also the hyperboloid defined above is invariant we can conclude that AdS
3 has an
SO(2,2) symmetry.
One can probably show with pure group theoretical arguments that the SO(2,2) symmetry is isomorphic to an SL(2,R)×SL(2,R) symmetry. I would like to know however, if one can see this symmetry more explicitly in some representation of AdS3?
I suppose a starting point might be, that one can write the hyperboloid constraint equation as
1L2det(X−1−X1−X0+X2X0+X2X−1+X1)=1
i.e. there is some identification of the hyperboloid with the group manifold of
SL(2,R) itself. However, that does not tell us anything about the symmetries.
The only explanation that I have found (on page 12 of this pdf Master thesis) was that the group manifold of SL(2,R) carries the Killing-Cartan metric
g=12tr(g−1dg)2
which is invariant under the actions
g→kLgandg→gkR
with
kL,kR∈SL(2,R). But how does one get from the metric on
R2,2 to this Killing-Cartan metric? Also, I don't find this very explicit and was wondering if there is a more direct way.
This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-10-27 19:55 (UTC), posted by SE-user physicus