Equation (4.11) on page 146 of Sidney Coleman's book Aspects of Symmetry is the holomorphic path integral,
I=∫exp(−z∗Az)Πdzdz∗=1det(A),
where A is Hermitian positive definite and ∗ is complex conjugation. As Coleman suggests, it is fairly easy to get this result by diagonalizing A. However, I also tried a different route, which gives a completely different answer and I cannot see my error. Here is my alternative calculation.
Put z=(p+iq)/√2 and use real integrals.
I=∫exp(−12(p−iq)A(p+iq))Πdzdz∗=∫exp(−12(pAp+ipAq−iqAp+qAq)Πdzdz∗=∫dqexp(−12qAq)∫dpexp(−12pAp−i2p(A−AT)q).
The real measure is,
dp=dmp(2π)m/2
and an analogous measure for dq. The real integral over dp is a case of,
J=∫dpexp(−12pAp+bp)=exp(12bA−1b)√detA
which is equation (4.9) on the same page of Coleman's book. I've checked J is correct. Using J in I,
I=1√detA∫dqexp(−12qAq)exp(−18q(A−AT)TA−1(A−AT)q)=1√detA∫dqexp(−12q(A+14(A−AT)TA−1(A−AT))q)=1√det(A)det(A+14(A−AT)TA−1(A−AT))
where the last line used another application of J. If A is Hermitian so that AT=A∗ the extra term in the second determinant does not vanish and so the result is not the same as Coleman's calculation of I by diagonalizing A. My question is , "Where is my error in the use of the real integrals to calculate I?"
Edit: Thanks to Qmechanic's hints, the error is because I used real integral J which assumes A is real, symmetric, positive definite, but A is actually Hermitian.
This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-12-19 09:03 (UTC), posted by SE-user Stephen Blake