Proof of the proposition 6.4.
First we prove that ωQ((Ra)∗X)=ad(a−1)ωQ(X) where a∈H and X∈Tv(Q) with v∈Q. Given that ωP is a connection one-form in the principal bundle P(M,G); given that v∈P , X∈Tv(P) and a∈G; then it is verified that
ωP((Ra)∗X)=ad(a−1)ωP(X)
.
Now, let ϕ the m-component of ωP restricted to the subbundle Q, then it is possible to write ωP=ωQ+ϕ; and for hence we have that
(ωQ+ϕ)((Ra)∗X)=ad(a−1)(ωQ+ϕ)(X)
ωQ((Ra)∗X)+ϕ((Ra)∗X)=ad(a−1)(ωQ(X)+ϕ(X))
ωQ((Ra)∗X)+ϕ((Ra)∗X)=a(ωQ(X)+ϕ(X))a−1
ωQ((Ra)∗X)+ϕ((Ra)∗X)=aωQ(X)a−1+aϕ(X)a−1
ωQ((Ra)∗X)+ϕ((Ra)∗X)=ad(a−1)ωQ(X)+ad(a−1)ϕ(X)
.
The generators for the subalgebra h are denoted by ˆhα and the generators for m are denoted ˆmβ; then we have that
[ωQ((Ra)∗X)]αˆhα+[ϕ((Ra)∗X)]βˆmβ=
ad(a−1)([ωQ(X)]αˆhα)+ad(a−1)([ϕ(X)]βˆmβ)
which is rewritten as
[ωQ((Ra)∗X)]αˆhα+[ϕ((Ra)∗X)]βˆmβ=
[ωQ(X)]αad(a−1)(ˆhα)+[ϕ(X)]βad(a−1)(ˆmβ)
and then we have that
[ωQ((Ra)∗X)]αˆhα+[ϕ((Ra)∗X)]βˆmβ=[ωQ(X)]αEβαˆhβ+[ϕ(X)]βCγβˆmγ
where Eβα and Cγβ are constants.; and the Einstein summation convention was used.
Then, given that ˆhα and ˆmβ are linearly independent, we deduce that
[ωQ((Ra)∗X)]αˆhα=[ωQ(X)]αEβαˆhβ
ωQ((Ra)∗X)=[ωQ(X)]αad(a−1)(ˆhα)
ωQ((Ra)∗X)=ad(a−1)([ωQ(X)]αˆhα)
ωQ((Ra)∗X)=ad(a−1)ωQ(X)
.
Second, we prove that ωQ(A∗)=A, where A∈h and A∗ is the fundamental vector field corresponding to A. Then, given that ωP(A∗)=A and ϕ(A∗)=0 we have that
ωP=ωQ+ϕ
ωP(A∗)=ωQ(A∗)+ϕ(A∗)
A=ωQ(A∗)+0
A=ωQ(A∗)