Quantcast
Processing math: 100%
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.
W3Counter Web Stats

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public β tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

208 submissions , 166 unreviewed
5,138 questions , 2,258 unanswered
5,413 answers , 23,081 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
822 active unimported users
More ...

  Differential Geometry of the Higgs Field

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
1063 views

I am trying to understand the mathematical structure of the Higgs fields and the Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking according to the spirit of the Nakahara`s book  "Geometry, Topology and Physics"  and the paper in the same spirit by  G.Sardanashvily  "Geometry of Classical Higgs Fields" (http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0510168.pdf).  In few words the Nakahara`s spirit consists in to convert in physics the theorems in "Foundations of Differential Geometry Vol 1" by Kobayashi and Nomizu (Please look an example of this at http://www.physicsoverflow.org/32653/differential-geometry-of-the-standard-model).   In this sense I think that the proposition 5.6, the proposition 6.4  and the proposition 7.4 in chapter II of  Kobayashi-Nomizu give a very important foundation of the mathematical structure of the Higgs field and the Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking  from the point of view of the modern differential geometry. 

Proposition 5.6.  The structure group G of a principal bundle  P(M,G) is reducible to a closed subgroup H of G if and only if the associated bundle E(M,G/H,G,P)  admits  a global cross section σ:M(E=P/H).

Proposition 6.4.  Let  Q(M,H) be a principal subbundle of the principal bundle P(M,G),  where H is a Lie.subgroup of G. Assume that the Lie algebra g of G admits a subspace m such that g=mh (direct sum).and  ad(H)(m)m, where h is the Lie algebra of H. For every connection  one-form ωP in the principal bundle P,  the h-component ωQ of ωP restricted to the principal subbundle Q is a connection one-form in Q.

Proposition 7.4.  Let P(M,G) be  a principal bundle and E(M,G/H,G,P) the associated bundle with standard fibre G/H, where H is a closed subgroup of G. Let σ:ME be a global cross section and Q(M,H) the reduced subbundle of P(M,G)  corresponding to the global cross section σ according with  Proposition 5.6. Then a connection ΓP in P is reducible to a connection  ΓQ in Q if and only the global cross section σ is parallel with respect to  ΓP .

My questions are: 

1. How to prove the propositions 5.6, 6.4 and 7.4?

2. How to apply the propositions 5.6, 6.4 and 7.4  to the Higgs fields and the Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking ?

asked Jul 30, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by juancho (1,130 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jul 31, 2015 by juancho

2 Answers

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

Proof of the proposition 6.4.

First we prove that ωQ((Ra)X)=ad(a1)ωQ(X) where aH and XTv(Q) with vQ.  Given that ωP is a connection one-form in the principal bundle P(M,G); given that vP , XTv(P)   and aG; then it is verified that

ωP((Ra)X)=ad(a1)ωP(X)

.

Now, let  ϕ the m-component of  ωP restricted to the subbundle Q, then it is possible to write ωP=ωQ+ϕ; and for hence we have that

(ωQ+ϕ)((Ra)X)=ad(a1)(ωQ+ϕ)(X)

ωQ((Ra)X)+ϕ((Ra)X)=ad(a1)(ωQ(X)+ϕ(X))

ωQ((Ra)X)+ϕ((Ra)X)=a(ωQ(X)+ϕ(X))a1

ωQ((Ra)X)+ϕ((Ra)X)=aωQ(X)a1+aϕ(X)a1

ωQ((Ra)X)+ϕ((Ra)X)=ad(a1)ωQ(X)+ad(a1)ϕ(X)

.

The generators for the subalgebra h are denoted by ˆhα and the generators for m are denoted ˆmβ; then we have that

[ωQ((Ra)X)]αˆhα+[ϕ((Ra)X)]βˆmβ=

ad(a1)([ωQ(X)]αˆhα)+ad(a1)([ϕ(X)]βˆmβ)

which is rewritten as

[ωQ((Ra)X)]αˆhα+[ϕ((Ra)X)]βˆmβ=

[ωQ(X)]αad(a1)(ˆhα)+[ϕ(X)]βad(a1)(ˆmβ)

and then we have that

[ωQ((Ra)X)]αˆhα+[ϕ((Ra)X)]βˆmβ=[ωQ(X)]αEβαˆhβ+[ϕ(X)]βCγβˆmγ

where Eβα and Cγβ are constants.; and the  Einstein summation convention was used.

Then, given that ˆhα and ˆmβ are linearly independent, we deduce that

[ωQ((Ra)X)]αˆhα=[ωQ(X)]αEβαˆhβ

ωQ((Ra)X)=[ωQ(X)]αad(a1)(ˆhα)

ωQ((Ra)X)=ad(a1)([ωQ(X)]αˆhα)

ωQ((Ra)X)=ad(a1)ωQ(X)

.

Second, we prove that ωQ(A)=A, where Ah and A is the fundamental vector field corresponding to A. Then, given that ωP(A)=A and ϕ(A)=0  we have that

ωP=ωQ+ϕ

ωP(A)=ωQ(A)+ϕ(A)

A=ωQ(A)+0

A=ωQ(A)

answered Jul 31, 2015 by juancho (1,130 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jul 31, 2015 by juancho
+ 2 like - 0 dislike

Application of the proposition 5.6 to the Higgs field and the Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking:

From the physical point of view the proposition 5.6 says that there is a spontaneous symmetry breaking from G to H  if an only if exists a Higgs field. In proposition 5.6, the Yang-Mills  bundle is the principal bundle P(M,G); the Higgs bundle is the associated bundle E(M,G/H,G,P); the Higgs field is the  global cross section  σ.

In General Relativity, the metric g plays the role of the Higgs field and then the metric produces a spontaneous symmetry breaking from GL+4(R) to SO(1,3)  (http://arxiv.org/pdf/1212.6702.pdf).

More formally,  The structure group GL+4(R) of the principal bundle  P(M,GL+4(R))  over a space-time manifold M is reduced to the closed subgroup SO(1,3) of GL+4(R)  by the metric g which is a global cross section of the form

g:M(E=P/SO(1,3))

where E is the associated bundle E(M,GL+4(R)/SO(1,3),GL+4(R),P).

answered Jul 30, 2015 by juancho (1,130 points) [ revision history ]
edited Aug 1, 2015 by juancho

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol in the following word:
pysicsverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...