About a year ago, Jeff Atwood wrote a blog post titled The Death of Meta Tags. In it, he wrote:
From this point on, meta-tagging is explicitly discouraged.
How can you tell you’re using a meta-tag? It’s easier than you might think.
If the tag can’t work as the only tag on a question, it’s probably a meta-tag. Every tag you use should be able to work, more or less, as the only tag on a question. Meta-tags, like [beginner]
, [subjective]
, and [best-practices]
, are useless by themselves — they tell you nothing at all about the content of the question.
If the tag commonly means different things to different people, it’s probably a meta-tag. In a cruel, ironic twist, the meaning of the tag [subjective]
itself … is actually subjective. Ditto for [best-practices]
and [beginner]
. Best practices to whom? Beginner by what criteria? These tags are impossible to define by anything remotely resembling an objective metric. In comparison, the meaning of tags like [java]
, [c#]
, and [javascript]
are crystal clear to all but the nuttiest of nutbags.
This is now policy for all SE sites, and consequently, I'm about to blow away the tags help-a-mathematician and reference-request. Please help the site out by not recreating them, okay? Thanks!
This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)