Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,789 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Import queue

+ 5 like - 0 dislike
118871 views

Request questions from sites on the StackExchange networks that are on-topic here too, to be imported here. Moderators may then import the question.

Addendum

This thread can not only be used to request importing single questions, but PhysicsOverflow members who like some or all of their (for PhysicsOverflow on topic) SE posts imported can say so in a corresponding answer here too. Any other specific list of questions is fine too.

asked Feb 8, 2014 in Public Official Posts by Dilaton (6,240 points) [ revision history ]
edited Feb 5, 2015 by dimension10
Most voted comments show all comments

@RonMaimon I agree, but hide, not delete (delete erases from the database itself).  

@Dilaton On SE, answers can be ordered by time if one needs to, but not here.  

@RonMaimon hiding is ok But concerning references and study material (concerning advanced topics) they newer cluttered any site on SE (not the ones I was interested in) so they will not here either. They were considered legitimate in TP.SE and they are not forbidden on MathOverflow. So please dont introduce this for (advanced) students and people who want to learn about a new topic obstructive SE point of view (in SE they always said you can ask in chat which means forget about it because there are no physics people in chat)

ok, but the point is that it shouldn't come with rep, and it's extremely easy to do, and it only needs to be done once in each topic, so perhaps when reviews are up, it can be done in reviews. You can ask the same question on each topic, I think it's best to make a literature review for each tag on reviews, so that each topic has a set of references people can add to. It's just not effort to find literature.

@Ron Maimon what do you mean exactly by "the post disappeared"?! I hope there's no auto-deletion in Q2A core, like there is on SE.  

I meant it moved to a random position in the questions list, it wasn't bumped anymore.

Most recent comments show all comments

Nah, I think we do not (yet) have to start deleting, this and the community moderation threads can naturally get pretty long, but I conjecture that thethe number of answers can get large but it should stay finite ...

Ok, hid them. If you find this annoying, unhide. I still think book recommendations belongs in meta, it will clutter up the main site. (I unhid them myself, as it caused the question to disappear for lack of activity)

167 Answers

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

[IMPORTED]

Please import the following (if not yet imported):


http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/203944/why-exactly-do-sometimes-universal-covers-and-sometimes-central-extensions-feat

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/80972/if-renormalization-scale-is-arbitrary-why-do-we-care-about-running-couplings ;

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/116985/can-the-berry-connection-be-derived-from-a-metric

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/32368/hamiltonian-mechanics-and-special-relativity

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/195414/conformal-blocks-in-2d-cfts

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/194815/what-is-crossover

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/194520/what-is-the-defintion-of-a-current-current-diagram

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/5682/what-are-the-uses-of-hopf-algebras-in-physics

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/193380/symmetry-breaking-to-a-special-subalgebra

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/193100/difference-between-locality-and-causality

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/192946/exact-meaning-of-locality-and-its-implications-on-the-formulation-of-a-qft

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/193506/what-is-phix0-rangle

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/193272/supersymmetric-chiral-qcd-resource-recommendations

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/148674/irreducible-representations-from-cartan-matrix/

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/141356/semiclassical-limit-of-quantum-mechanics/

answered Nov 1, 2015 by Arnold Neumaier (15,787 points) [ revision history ]

Ok, I will import them ...

... they are now (in the same order as requested) here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
answered Feb 15, 2016 by Arnold Neumaier (15,787 points) [ revision history ]
edited Feb 15, 2016 by Dilaton

Ok, they are now here and here ...

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
answered Feb 19, 2016 by Physics Moron (285 points) [ revision history ]
edited Feb 20, 2016 by Dilaton

The question is now here ;-)

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
answered Oct 4, 2016 by Arnold Neumaier (15,787 points) [ revision history ]
edited Oct 4, 2016 by Dilaton

It is now here.

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
answered Oct 30, 2016 by Arnold Neumaier (15,787 points) [ revision history ]
edited Oct 30, 2016 by Dilaton
+ 1 like - 0 dislike
answered Nov 8, 2016 by Optimus Prime (105 points) [ revision history ]
edited Nov 8, 2016 by Dilaton

Hi Optimus Prime, welcome to PhysicsOverflow !

They are now here, here, here, here, and here.

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
answered Nov 9, 2016 by Optimus Prime (105 points) [ revision history ]
edited Nov 9, 2016 by Dilaton

It is now here.

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
answered Nov 10, 2016 by Optimus Prime (105 points) [ revision history ]
edited Nov 10, 2016 by Dilaton

They are now here and here.

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
answered Nov 10, 2016 by Optimus Prime (105 points) [ revision history ]

It is now here.

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
answered Nov 27, 2016 by Optimus Prime (105 points) [ revision history ]

It is now here.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\varnothing$ysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...