Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

174 submissions , 137 unreviewed
4,308 questions , 1,640 unanswered
5,089 answers , 21,602 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
635 active unimported users
More ...

  tadpole cancellation at orbifold singularities

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
34 views

I was recently going through the literature on RR-field tadpole cancellation for fractional D-branes stuck at orbifold/orientifold singularities.

A clean review is in chapter 4 of Marchesano's thesis arXivhep-th/0307252.

There formula (4.9) gives the condition for tadpole cancellation of D4-branes at a G-orbifold singularity, and (4.15) is the analogue with an O8-plane intersecting, following Honecker's arXiv:0201037. Other cases like for D5-branes in (4.12) look slightly different, but always involve the same representation theoretic expressions -- namely the total characters of the linear representation corresponding to the brane configuration evaluated away from the neutral group element (as highlighted on top of p. 49 in Marchesano's text).

Now, the multiples of the regular representation (corresponding to the "mobile brane") always solve the homogeneous condition (4.9), and hence sums of the trivial rep cancelling the O-plane charge with any regular representation always solve the inhomogeneous condition (4.15). This is more or less highlighted on p. 49.

But it seems to me that these are in fact the only solutions. (!?)

This follows from a general representation-theoretic argument, which I have spelled out here. But it may also be checked explicitly in examples, which I have spelled out here.

So I am pretty sure this conclusion holds, but if you think I am overlooking anything, please drop me a note. If it holds, this would seem to be a fact worth highlighting. If anyone can point me to literature which makes this explicit, please let me know.

asked Feb 3 in Theoretical Physics by Urs Schreiber (6,015 points) [ no revision ]

Please log in or register to answer this question.





user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...