Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

206 submissions , 164 unreviewed
5,103 questions , 2,249 unanswered
5,355 answers , 22,794 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Casimir operators of de Sitter space

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
951 views

De-Sitter space can be thought of as a 4 dimensional hyperboloid embedded in 5D Minkowski space. Hence, the symmetry group of dS is $SO(1,4)$ whose generators are,

$J_{AB}=i\left(X_A\frac{\partial}{\partial X_B}-X_B\frac{\partial}{\partial X_A}\right)$

where $A,B=0,1,2,3,4$. They follow the standard $SO(1,4)$ commutation relations,

$\left[J_{AB},J_{CD}\right]=i\left(\eta_{BC}J_{AD}+\eta_{AD}J_{BC}-\eta_{AC}J_{BD}-\eta_{BD}J_{AC}\right)$

where $\eta_{AB}=(-1,1,1,1,1)$. The coordinates on the dS hyperboloid (whose equation is, $\eta_{AB}X^AX^B=\frac{1}{H^2}$)  are,

$X^0=-\frac{1}{2H}\left(H\eta-\frac{1}{H\eta}\right)+\frac{x^2}{2\eta}$

$X^i=\frac{x^i}{H\eta}$

$X^4=-\frac{1}{2H}\left(H\eta+\frac{1}{H\eta}\right)+\frac{x^2}{2\eta}$

Here $i=1,2,3$.  $(\eta,\vec{x})$ are parameters on the hyperboloid. The 5D Minkowski metric restricted to the hyperboloid, in terms of these coordinates, becomes,

$ds^2=\frac{-d\eta^2+d\vec{x}^2}{H^2\eta^2}$.

Split the $SO(1,4)$ generators as,

$L_{ij}=J_{ij}$

$D=J_{04}$

$P_i=J_{0i}+J_{4i}$

$K_i=J_{4i}-J_{0i}$

It can be easily checked that in terms of the $\eta,\vec{x}$ coordinates,

$L_{ij}=i\left(x_i\partial_j-x_j\partial_i\right)$

$D=-i\left(\eta\partial_{\eta}+x^i\partial_i\right)$

$P_i=\frac{-i}{H}\partial_i$

$K_i=i\left[-2Hx^i\left(\eta\partial_{\eta}+x^i\partial_i\right)+H\left(-\eta^2+x^2\right)\partial_i\right]$

These generators follow the standard conformal algebra (check the one given in the big yellow book[1]). The point $\eta,\vec{x}=0$ is left invariant by $D,L_{ij},K_i$. Hence, if $\phi(\eta,\vec{x})$ is a classical field,

$L_{ij}\phi(0)=S_{ij}\phi(0)$

$D\phi(0)=-i\Delta\phi(0)$

$K_i\phi(0)=0$

Now, $SO(1,4)$ has two Casimir operators,

$C_1=-\frac{1}{2}J^{AB}J_{AB}$

$C_2=-W^AW_A$

where $W^A=\tfrac18 \epsilon^{ABCDE}J_{BC}J_{DE}$. In terms of the conformal genertors, 

$C_1=D^2-\tfrac12L_{ij}L^{ij}-\tfrac12\{P_i,K_i\}$

by making $C_1$ act on $\phi(0)$, the eigenvalues turn out to be,

$C_1=-s(s+1)-\Delta(\Delta-3)$

In terms of the conformal generators, the components of $W_A$ are, 

$W^0=\tfrac12\epsilon_{ijk}J^{ij}J_{k4}=\tfrac12L_k\left(P_k+K_k\right)$

$W^i=\tfrac12\epsilon_{ijk}J_{jk}J_{04}-\epsilon_{ijk}J_{j4}J_{0k}=-L^iD+\tfrac14\epsilon_{ijk}\{K_j,P_k\}$

$W^4=-\tfrac12\epsilon_{ijk}J^{ij}J_{0k}=\tfrac12L_k\left(P_k-K_k\right)$

where $L_k=-\tfrac12\epsilon_{kij}L_{ij}$ and it has the following commutation rules,

$\left[L_i,L_j\right]=i\epsilon_{ijk}L_k$

$\left[L_i,D\right]=0$

$\left[L_i,P_j\right]=i\epsilon_{ijk}P_k$

$\left[L_i,K_j\right]=i\epsilon_{ijk}K_k$

Now, $W^2=-W_0^2+W_i^2+W_4^2=(W_4+W_0)(W_4-W_0)-[W_0,W_4]+W_i^2$, so when it acts on a classical field, the first term does not contribute since it has a $K_i$ on the right which annihilates the field. Also, it is easy to see that $L_k$ commutes with $W_0$ and $W_4$. Therefore,

$[W_0,W_4]=-L_k[J_{k4},L_iJ_{0i}]=-iL_kW_k$. 

In the formula for $W_k$, commuting the $P_i$ past the $K_i$ gives a factor of $iL_k$ so that

$W_k\phi(0)=-L_k(D-i)\phi(0)$. 

Thus, we get, 

$C_2\phi(0)=s(s+1)(\Delta+1)(\Delta+2)\phi(0)$ 

which is incorrect according to this[2] reference (their $q$ is my $\Delta-1$). The first Casimir is correct. The correct answer for $C_2$ should be $-s(s+1)(\Delta-1)(\Delta-2)$. Can somebody point out where I made a mistake? 


  [1]: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780387947853
  [2]: https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0309104

asked Apr 11, 2020 in Q&A by Sounak Sinha (10 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOverfl$\varnothing$w
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...