Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,789 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Does minimum length prevent conformal symmetry?

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
602 views

Or conversely, is there a way to combine conformal symmetry and minimum length (such as the Planck length)?

Are there papers exploring this possibility?

asked Oct 15, 2022 in Theoretical Physics by Klaus [ no revision ]
recategorized Oct 15, 2022 by Dilaton

Where does this idea of a minimum length come from?

Normally, in any physical problem, say in QM, there are characteristic lengths like the Bohr radius $a_0$ and alike, but the space coordinates run from zero to infinity, so there are shorter lengths than $a_0$. Similarly with the Plank length - there are shorter distances than it. At high enough energies $E$ you will reach much shorter distances. You may consider it as a "conformal symmetry" limit, if you like.

If you decide just to impose the smallest length with no physical justification, it is not physics anymore. Do discrete space modelling instead and call it a "discrete modelling" whatever the minimal length you chose. Even then you may have high enough energies $E$ that correspond to shorter distances, I guess. Or you want to impose the "maximal energy" $E_{\text{max}}$ in your theory?

Your comment does not answer the question.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOv$\varnothing$rflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...