Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,355 answers , 22,793 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Derivation of equation 3.10 from ADM paper

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
610 views

I am currently reading the  ADM paper  https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0405109 on General Relativity and I am having trouble deriving equations 3.10-3.11 from 3.9 a). I did get to the equation $$^4g^{0i}(N^2({^4g^{0k}g_{ik}})-N_i)=0$$ which holds if 3.11 a) is true. However I don't know how to derive it directly since the implicit sum over $i$ does not allow one to write $N^2{(^4g^{0k}g_{ik})}-N_i=0$. Any help or hint would be much appreciated!

asked Apr 30 in Theoretical Physics by anonymous [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

I eventually found a derivation. The issue is finding the right relations to use for the metric tensor since they are so many. Instead of the notation used in the paper I used $q_{ij}$ to denote the 3-metric and $g_{\mu\nu}$ for the 4-dimensional one. Here it is in case someone else needs it:

From 3.9 a) we immediately obtain $g^{00}=-\frac{1}{N^2}$.

From the orthogonality relation $g^{\mu0}g_{\mu0}=1$, we obtain
\begin{equation}
    g^{00}g_{00}+g^{i0}g_{i0}=1\implies -\frac{1}{N^2}g_{00} + g^{i0}N_i=1
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
    \implies g_{00}=-N^2(1-g^{i0}N_i).
\end{equation}
We now use $g_{\mu i}g^{\mu 0}=0$ to get
\begin{equation}
    g_{0i}g^{00}+g_{ji}g^{j0}=0\implies N_i(-\frac{1}{N^2})+q_{ij}g^{j0}=0.
\end{equation}
Multiplying by the inverse 3-metric $q^{ik}$ and summing over $i$ gives
\begin{equation}
    N^k(-\frac{1}{N^2})+\delta^k_jg^{j0}=0
\end{equation}
where $N^k=q^{ik}N_i$. Then
\begin{equation}
    N^k(-\frac{1}{N^2})+g^{k0}=0
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
    \implies g^{k0}=\frac{N^k}{N^2}.
\end{equation}
This leads to
\begin{equation}
    g_{00}=-(N^2-N^iN_i)
\end{equation}
Further, we have
\begin{equation}
    g^{\mu j}g_{\mu i}=\delta^j_i \implies g^{0j}g_{0i}+g^{kj}g_{ki}=\delta^j_i \implies g^{0j}N_i + g^{kj}q_{ki}=\delta^j_i
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
    \implies g^{kj}q_{ki}=\delta^j_i - g^{0j}N_i
\end{equation}
Multiplying by $q^{il}$ and summing over $i$ gives
\begin{equation}
    g^{kj}\delta^l_k=q^{jl}-g^{0j}N^l
\end{equation}
and we finally get, relabelling the indices $l \to i$ and using the symmetry property of the metric tensor,
\begin{equation}
    g^{ij}=q^{ij}-\frac{N^iN^j}{N^2}.
\end{equation}

answered May 1 by anonymous [ revision history ]
edited May 27

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysic$\varnothing$Overflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...