Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,355 answers , 22,793 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Structure of eigenstate expectation algebra?

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
223 views

I've been thinking about the algebra of observables in spin systems a lot recently and, with only a relatively standard background in abstract algebra, wonder if some of the objects I've been considering have been considered by mathematicians. 

The construction I'm interested in is as follows. Let $A$ be the algebra of observables on a lattice system with Hamiltonian $H$. The Hamiltonian defines a set of eigenstates; let us take $\langle \cdot\rangle:A \to \mathbb{R}$ to be the linear functional on the algebra furnished by the ground state. This is guaranteed to exist and also has some guaranteed properties: in particular, $\langle H O\rangle = \langle H\rangle \langle O \rangle$. 

The algebra $A$ has a number of relations between elements given by the multiplication table and in many cases by the Lie bracket between operators. I am wondering about the structure of the image of the algebra under the map $\langle \cdot \rangle$, which I'll call $\langle A \rangle$. The algebraic relations on $A$ descend to relations on this 'expected value algebra'; if $O_1 O_2 = O_3$ in $A$, then $\langle O_1O_2 \rangle = \langle O_3\rangle$ in $\langle A \rangle$. 

If the ground state is translation invariant, then we also have equivalences like $\langle O(n) O)(n+m)\rangle = \langle O(0)O(m)\rangle$, so many elements of $A$ are mapped to the same element of $\langle A \rangle$. 

Finally, we have the relations $\langle H O\rangle = \langle H\rangle \langle O \rangle$, which will create even more identifications in the image of $A$ under $\langle \cdot \rangle$. 

So the question is, given a characterization of $A$ and of the map $\langle \cdot \rangle$, what is the structure of the expected value algebra $\langle A \rangle$? In the case that $A$ is the Pauli algebra on $N$ qubits, $A$ has 4^N elements; how many unique elements are in $\langle A \rangle$? What is a basis for the algebra? Does this type of algebraic structure have a name? 

I am imagining that the 'constraints' inherited from the symmetry of the state or the relation $\langle H O\rangle = \langle H\rangle \langle O \rangle$ define ideals in $A$, and I am asking about the quotient of $A$ by these ideals. So perhaps there is an idea of constructing Grobner bases for the ideals that is relevant here? 

I am hoping that someone has some ideas about references, definitions, or similar constructions in the mathematical literature that might be useful. This paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.13111) of Raamsdonk is vaguely related to the question, but not exactly. 

asked Jun 18 in Q&A by gorg (15 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
$\varnothing\hbar$ysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...